17 Reasons to Vote for Hillary Clinton

From: Eagle Rising

Written by Gary Fouse


Donald Trump is not the candidate I wished to see win the Republican nomination. However, he won it fair and square. He was the People’s choice. Many conservatives and Republicans are reluctant to vote for Trump for obvious reasons. I have decided to vote for Trump because I cannot stand the thought of a corrupt person like Hillary Clinton traipsing back into the White House with her equally corrupt husband.

But for those who don’t like either candidate, it simply has to come down to the issues one cares about. In that respect, the choice becomes clear for both sides.

If you want higher taxes on everyone, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see American businesses continue to ship their jobs overseas due to higher taxes and more regulations, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see a continuation and expansion of Obamacare, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see the interests of other countries satisfied to the detriment of our own, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see a Justice Department that will go after police while ignoring corruption within the administration, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see the Black Lives Matter movement supported and encouraged while more cops are executed in our streets, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see more and more restrictions placed on gun ownership, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see a continuation and expansion of an open borders policy with little enforcement on the southern border, sanctuary cities, and lack of manpower and resources for our immigration and Border Patrol officers, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see a five-fold increase in the number of so-called Syrian refugees admitted into this country, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see a continuation of a disastrous foreign policy in regards to Russia, Iran and especially the Middle East, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see a continued distancing of our government from Israel in favor of the Arab/Muslim/Palestinian world, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see more and more Islamic influence in our government and in our communities, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see Huma Abedin, a Muslim Brotherhood operative, and the corrupt lawyer Cheryl Mills occupying critical positions in the White House, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see attacks on our First Amendment rights particularly in regards to Islamic extremism, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see 2 or 3 more liberals appointed to the Supreme Court giving liberals an absolute majority for the next generation, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you want to see a scandal-marred administration neck deep in criminal investigations a’la Nixon after he was re-elected in 1972 in the midst of Watergate, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

If you like seeing massive corruption in government, Hillary Clinton is your candidate.

Have I left anything out? Surely I have.

But if the above possibilities are repugnant to you, we only have one choice, and that is Donald Trump. It is not Gary Johnson; it is not Jill Stein; it is not John McCain, and it is not Mickey Mouse.

We conservatives and those of us who care about an honest government only have one choice to defeat Hillary Clinton. It is Donald Trump.


God bless,
JohnnyD

Democrat Analyst Gives the Best Reason NOT to Vote for Hillary Clinton

From: United Voice


There are a LOT of reasons not to vote for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. In fact, the Internet is rife with endless lists of reasons. Let’s see, there’s her dishonesty, corruption, coverups, viciousness, greed, narcissism, scheming, and conniving, to name just a few. Not to mention the fact that the FBI and other officials in-the-know actually consider her a traitor. But if all this isn’t enough to convince you, then Doug Schoen, political analyst, author, commentator, AND Democrat, might just have the straw that will break your camel’s back.

Schoen, a lifetime Democrat who has worked for both Bill and Hillary Clinton, announced on Sunday that after the latest revelation of Clinton emails on Friday, he could not in good conscience vote for Hillary for president. But it’s not for the reasons listed above. He actually liked the Clintons. He said he shares their worldview. But he also said after a long night of deliberating and soul-searching on Saturday, he became absolutely convinced that Hillary as president could be the worst thing that ever happened to America.

“I made one of the most difficult decisions of my life–not just political, but also personal–last night,” he said. Following the revelation of new Clinton emails by FBI Director James Comey on Friday, Schoen realized that electing Hillary for president could set off a chain of events not so different from what happened during Watergate, which he happened to be around for, and even wrote a book about it.

“What troubled me most [during Watergate], other than the crimes committed, was that the United States was paralyzed and unable to act,” he said. “President Nixon and the government were rendered impotent, unable to govern and meet its responsibilities to the American public. I worry that the same thing could happen after a victory by Secretary Clinton and could carry on into her term of office.”

He said that if Hillary is elected, he believes the U.S. government will be unable to resolve issues surrounding the crisis and will suffer from the disruption of daily operations, to the point of complete paralysis.

“I am now convinced that we will be facing the very real possibility of a constitutional crisis with many dimensions and deleterious consequences should Secretary Clinton win the election,” he said.

Here is the sequence of events that Schoen sees in the U.S. government if Hillary Clinton is elected president:

• On the first day of her presidency, she will be under investigation by the FBI.
• All branches of government will become paralyzed, impotent, and unable to govern.
• Departments, like the FBI and Department of Justice, will start investigating each other.
• There will be no honeymoon for Clinton, and you can forget the “first 100 days” agenda. That will take a back seat to partisan divisions and polarization, with little getting done in Congress. Washington will become even more hyper-partisan and gridlocked.
• National security will be jeopardized by ongoing investigations by the FBI and maybe the Justice Department and possibly even Congress, leaving us vulnerable to our enemies.
• If and when she’s convicted, she will either have to be pardoned by another president or pardon herself. Americans would never stand for that.

For all of you who were around when Bill Clinton first took office, just think back on all the Clinton legal crap we’ve been force-fed over the years. Bill’s scandals with women, namely Monica Lewinsky, who got him impeached: the lies, the coverups, and deceptions. Remember when the Clinton legal tangles went on endlessly like some sick, twisted background noise, all day, every day? Do we really want FOUR YEARS of this all over again?


God bless,
JohnnyD

Huma reportedly 'flipped' against Hillary

20 shocking Clinton-scandal developments in 24 hours

From: World Net Daily

by - Garth Kant

WASHINGTON – Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s closest aide, has reportedly “flipped” and is cooperating with investigators looking into possible crimes by the former secretary of state.

Breitbart is reporting that is because Abedin fears she could go to jail over the scandal.

Blackwater founder and retired Navy SEAL Erik Prince said “well-placed” sources in the New York Police Department told him “(Anthony) Weiner and Huma Abedin, his wife – the closest adviser of Hillary Clinton for 20 years – have both flipped.”

“They are cooperating with the government,” Prince claimed. “They both have – they see potential jail time of many years for their crimes, for Huma Abedin sending and receiving and even storing hundreds of thousands of messages from the State Department server and from Hillary Clinton’s own homebrew server, which contained classified information. Weiner faces all kinds of exposure for the inappropriate sexting that was going on and for other information that they found.”

The aide who has been constantly at Clinton’s side for decades dropped off the campaign trail almost immediately after news broke a week ago that the FBI had discovered that vast trove of emails on her estranged husband’s laptop. Although apparently exiled from the campaign itself, Abedin did appear at a Clinton fundraiser Thursday evening in Washington. It was her first public appearance since she left the campaign trail.

Prince also claimed the NYPD is “ready to make arrests” in the Weiner underage-sexting case that led to the discovery of a reported 650,000 of his wife’s emails on his laptop.

And that sources in the department told him the NYPD wanted to hold a press conference but has been prevented by intense pressure from the Justice Department.

He also claimed, as the first ones to see the contents of the laptop, NYPD investigators found criminal activity by Clinton and her immediate circle, then forced the FBI to reopen the Clinton email investigation and go public with the discovery of the Weiner emails, or they would.

Additionally, multiple news outlets have reported there are now at least five federal investigations into the Clintons and their close friends and associates.

Also in the last 24 hours, CBS reported on Thursday evening that the FBI has found emails “related” to Clinton’s role as secretary of state on Weiner’s laptop.

CBS also confirmed earlier reports that the emails are not duplicates, meaning they are emails investigators have not seen before.

Investigators are said to be poring over previous statements made to the FBI by Clinton and her aides to see if there is any conflict with the massive amount of new information they are collecting.

The bombshell revelations are arriving almost hourly, with nearly two dozen in just the last two days. The single most explosive development came from Fox News, which reported that an indictment of Clinton is likely.

Here’s what happened in the previous 24 hours:

Indictment

Two sources “with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations into the Clinton emails and the Clinton Foundation” told Fox News’ Bret Baier an indictment is “likely” in the Clinton Foundation influence peddling scandal.

The only impediment would be “some obstruction in some way” from the Justice Department.

The big question for the Clinton campaign, and the country, would then be whether any indictment comes down before the election on Nov. 8.

Server hacked

Another bombshell from those sources was a “99 percent” probability the private email server Clinton used for official business as secretary of state was hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies.

The sources also reported that those foreign agencies did obtain information from Clinton’s server.

Clinton Foundation investigation

In addition to reporting the likelihood of an indictment in the inquiry, Fox’s sources said investigators are “actively and aggressively” looking into the Clinton Foundation.

They said the investigation is “far more expansive than anybody has reported so far,” it has been underway for more than a year and is a “very high priority.”

Contrary to previous reports, the sources said the laptops of former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills, and other top aide Heather Samuelson, definitely have not been destroyed. As part of an immunity agreement, the FBI had agreed to destroy those laptops after its first, but more narrowly focused, review.

A source noted those immunity deals would have been revoked if the recipients were found to have lied during the investigation.

Agents are reportedly scouring the laptops for evidence of pay-for-play, or influence peddling, by the former secretary of state and the Clinton Foundation.

The investigation is so expansive that agents have re-interviewed numerous people about case and interviewed other key figures for the first time.

Agents reported they gathered “a lot” of evidence even before the WikiLeaks disclosure and “there is an avalanche of new information coming every day.” Some of the fresh information is coming from WikiLeaks, some from new emails.

The Foundation investigation is reportedly being done by the white collar crime and public corruption branch of the FBI’s criminal investigative division.

Email investigation

The investigation into classified emails on Clinton’s server and her aides’ devices is reportedly being run by the FBI’s National Security division.

As CBS confirmed on Thursday, FBI agents reportedly found previously undiscovered emails they believe came from Clinton’s server on the laptop of Anthony Weiner.

Significantly, they say the emails are not duplicates, meaning they are emails investigators have not seen before.

Equally significant, the sources in the original report said some emails may contain classified information.

Treason

The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee accused Hillary Clinton of treason on Thursday.

Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said that was because Clinton had exposed sensitive information to foreign government hackers.

“She exposed it to our enemies, and now … our adversaries have this very sensitive information that not only jeopardizes her and national security at home, but the men and women serving overseas,” he charged.

“In my opinion, quite frankly, it’s treason,” said McCaul.

He continued, “The concern I’ve had all along is she has had seven special access programs on these devices. Those are the most classified, sensitive secrets in the federal government — many of them covert operations.”

“She took those devices overseas against the State Department’s wishes, and now we find out — and (FBI Director) James Comey told me previously — that it’s very likely that foreign adversary nations got into her private server,” McCaul concluded.

Justice Department cover-up

Top Justice Department officials ordered FBI investigators looking into the Clinton Foundation to “stand down” back in February, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.

The Foundation investigation was kept alive, according to Fox, by agents who obtained information from two informants and made a secret audio recording in a different probe into public corruption.

The agents were pursuing leads based on claims made in the book “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer.

The FBI reportedly believed it had enough evidence to prosecute Clinton but Justice Department officials disagreed.

A senior Justice Department official phoned FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to complain FBI agents were disobeying the stand down order.

“Are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?” McCabe reportedly asked.

After a pause, the senior DOJ official was said to have replied, “Of course not.”

Email leaks not from Russia

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said the Russian government is not the source of the thousands of emails his website has published from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

In an interview with Russia Today to be aired Saturday, Assange said the “Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything.”

Clinton and other top Democrats have repeatedly and loudly insisted the leaks were done by Russia to affect the presidential election. However, Clinton and other Democrats have not disputed the contents of the emails.

“Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia is the source of our publications,” said Assange. “That’s false; we can say that the Russian government is not our source.”

“I actually feel quite sorry for Hillary Clinton as a person,” he added, “because I see someone who is eaten alive by their ambitions, tormented literally to the point where they become sick – for example, faint – as a result of going on, and going with their ambitions.”

“But she represents a whole network of people, and a whole network of relationships with particular states,” Assange concluded.

Podesta warned Clinton

Lifezette uncovered a Wikileaks email on Thursday in which Podesta implicitly warned Clinton of the dangers of using her unsecured email system to discuss sensitive information.

In the 2014 emails, exchanged after she had resigned as secretary of state, Clinton asked Podesta if he had “any idea whose fighters attacked Islamist positions in Tripoli, Libya,” because it was “worth analyzing for future purposes.”

Realizing it was not an exchange that should be held on her unsecured email system, Podesta warned, “Yes and interesting but not for this channel.”

Another Wikileaks email dug up by Lifezette suggests Podesta himself was warned as far back as 2008 about the dangers of discussing sensitive information outside of official government channels.

President Obama’s first chief of staff, Denis McDonough, wrote to fellow transition team member Daniel Tarullo on Nov. 3, 2008, “I was struck by the memo partly because it was first I had heard of it but much more because it was a sensitive doc bumping around on public email addresses.”

“There is a very real threat to the security of our documents,” he added.

Tarullo added Podesta, who was also a member of Obama’s transition team, to the email chain.

McDonough then warned Podesta directly, “I know I’m like a broken record on this, but I think we should arrange a briefing on the cyber threat for all associated with your effort. We have a real security threat on our stuff here.”


God bless,
JohnnyD

Gregg Jarrett: An "avalanche of evidence" may now bury Hillary

From: Fox News

By - Gregg Jarrett - Published November 03, 2016

Americans who lived through the nightmares of both the Watergate and Lewinsky scandals recall vividly how every day seemed to produce new evidence of wrongdoing. The drip, drip of deceptions and lies finally overflowed into a cascading pool of criminality and disgust.     

The first scandal culminated in Articles of Impeachment.  The other an impeachment trial.  Is America now hurtling toward the same political abyss? It looks like it. So, fasten your seat belts and brace for impact.
Sources tell Fox News’s Bret Baier that the FBI has uncovered an “avalanche of evidence” in the Clinton Foundation investigation.

Agents are “actively and aggressively pursuing this case,” calling it a “very high priority.”

Armed with newly discovered email evidence and additional documents revealed by WikiLeaks, these sources say that agents will likely try to get Huma Abedin and others to cooperate in an effort to bring criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.

It is a stunning development. But that’s how avalanches happen. Suddenly, you’re buried before you know it.

If this is true, and if Clinton is elected president in a few days but thereafter indicted, several scenarios could unfold. 

She could resign before or after inauguration, leaving President Tim Kaine sitting behind a desk in the Oval Office. 

President Obama could pardon her before he departs that same office. 

Clinton, as president, could try to invoke broad constitutional immunity from prosecution, delaying her criminal trial until after she leaves office.  Or she could pardon herself.  

However, all of that may not matter much if a Republican House of Representatives moves to impeach her. Neither immunity nor pardons apply to the ultimate constitutional remedy of impeachment.

Thus, Americans will again be forced to suffer through another impeachment horror show. But Hillary may not be able to beat the rap the way her husband did back in 1999 when he was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice.   
    
What began as an investigation into the mishandling of classified documents… has now morphed into suspicions of rampant corruption involving Clinton’s charity. Specifically, that she used her position as Secretary of State to confer benefits to donors who lavished money on her foundation and personally enriched the Clintons.  And the case against her is accelerating.   

It was inevitable, I suppose, that her emails would intersect somehow with the incredible wealth amassed by the Clintons since they left the White House. There’s always a paper trail. Or pesky emails.  

Or, in the case of Richard Nixon, those damnable tapes. 

Two Investigations Merge

Hillary Clinton used her unauthorized, private email server not only to conduct State Department business involving thousands of classified documents, but it appears she also used the server for some of her foundation’s communications. The FBI has devoted more than a year to investigating whether the Clintons illegally leveraged their foundation for personal gain -- that is into tens of millions of dollars in potential self-dealing and so-called “pay-to-play”. 

As I pointed out in a previous column, all of this, if proved, could constitute bribery, fraud, and illegal use of a non-profit charity which smacks of racketeering. 

What’s that? Operating a criminal enterprise.  It is often associated with organized crime.  (See “mafia”)  There is also the related matter of perjury.  And obstruction of justice.  The same charges that were leveled against Bill Clinton back in the day.  

Importantly, the newly discovered Weiner/Abedin electronic devices appear to contain email evidence relevant to both the classified documents case and the Clinton Foundation case. In addition, sources confirm that laptops belonging to Clinton’s top aides, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, are now in the possession of the FBI and are being “exploited for more evidence.” The floodgates are open. 

While the foundation probe is now center stage, a reinvigorated look at whether Clinton mishandled classified documents has obviously been resurrected. It is possible that FBI Director Comey could reconsider his opinion of Clinton’s legal “intent” under the Espionage Act and reverse himself in his recommendation on prosecuting Clinton.  Sources say there is a 99 percent chance that up to 5 foreign intelligence agencies may have accessed Clinton’s emails and stolen them, putting a lie to President Obama’s claim that Clinton did not jeopardize national security.  

The Clinton Foundation

As "Fox News Sunday" anchor Chris Wallace pointed out in the final debate, “emails show that donors got special access”  to Clinton while Secretary of State. While that is surely unseemly or improper, it is illegal only if Clinton used her position to confer a benefit in exchange for money. That is, if donors rewarded Clinton with cash.  
  
So, here is an example of what might be illegal.  It has been reported that Clinton helped UBS avoid the IRS. Bill then got paid $ 1.5 million dollars and their foundation received a ten-fold increase in donations by the bank.  If the money was a reward for Clinton’s work on behalf of UBS, then that could be considered bribery under federal law. And racketeering.  

Another example: it has been reported that Clinton’s state department approved billions of dollars in arms sales to several nations whose governments gave money to the Clinton Foundation.  Again, if it can be proven there was a quid-pro-quo, it would be illegal. 

This is where the WikiLeaks hacked emails come into play.  Messages show that charity official Doug Band, while raising money for the foundation, also steered millions of dollars to Bill Clinton. The cash came from foundation donors who had business before Hillary’s state department.  Band’s emails, in which he brags about his prowess in funneling up to $66 million to Bill, make explicit how the Clintons appear to have used their foundation for personal profit.

Organized crime and Illegal syndicates tend to use legitimate-looking businesses as a “front” to try to fool law enforcement.  Often, they devise a “dual purpose” company -- one which operates lawfully from the front door, but unlawfully out the backdoor. There is little doubt that the Clinton Foundation operated as a charity. But if there was a secondary, hidden purpose devoted to self-dealing and personal enrichment, and if the foundation was merely a conduit, then prosecution could be pursued under federal anti-corruption statutes.

Did DOJ Obstruct The FBI?

It’s beginning to look that way. Even after Comey announced in July that he would not recommend prosecuting Clinton, the investigation into her foundation was still being actively pursued by some agents within the FBI. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Justice Department became angry over this and agents were told to “stand down.”  Whether that happened is disputed. 

However, it appears that FBI agents wanted to examine emails on non-government laptops that were part of the Clinton classified documents case. They felt there might be evidence that the foundation was being used illegally by the Clintons, as noted above. But Justice Department prosecutors allegedly stopped them from doing it.   

Why? Was Justice protecting Clinton? Can we be assured that the renewed investigation of Clinton won’t be obstructed by an attorney general with allegiances to both Hillary and Bill Clinton?   

Time For an Independent Counsel    

Given these reports of DOJ’s interference, there are serious and legitimate doubts about the integrity of the government’s ability to investigation Clinton. 

Attorney General Loretta Lynch was compromised from the beginning. She was first elevated to the position of U.S. Attorney by Bill Clinton. She met privately with him just days before a decision was made as to whether his wife would be prosecuted.

As if that were not enough, Lynch’s boss, President Obama, defended Clinton publicly last April on "Fox News Sunday" by declaring, in essence, she did not break the law. He made the same argument during an earlier “60 Minutes” interview.  He prejudged the outcome of the case.

This sent a pretty clear message to those in charge of just how the president wanted the question of prosecution to turn out.  Now, it appears that Lynch’s Department is heeding that message by actively obstructing the FBI’s investigation. 

The attorney general has failed or refused to appoint a Special Prosecutor to ensure that these investigations are fair and impartial. President Obama could demand one, as well. He likely will not. His conflict of interest is as glaring as Lynch’s.

After all, the president has been campaigning vigorously for Clinton to succeed him. Why would he now jeopardize the chance of preserving or even burnishing his legacy? Donald Trump is vowing, if elected, to unwind much of what Mr. Obama has accomplished.  

Therefore, it is up to Congress to reauthorize the Independent Counsel Act to accomplish the same. It would direct the attorney general to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to appoint one. No choice. 

Sadly, this may be the only way the public’s trust can be restored.


God bless,
JohnnyD

FBI Director Comey, the Deadest Man in Deadonia

From: Constitution

By Tad Cronn November 1, 2016 


In just a matter of a few days, FBI Director James Comey has gone from being a Democratic hero to the man the Left would most like to see separated from his head.

Just in case you’ve been under a rock, the FBI this weekend reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails after a laptop with more than half a million Clinton-related emails was discovered during an investigation of former Democratic congressman Anthony Weiner, husband to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin.

The whirlwind reactions have been nothing short of stunning. The only thing I can think to compare it to is July 13, 1973, the moment after the unassuming Deputy Chief of Staff Alexander Butterfield revealed to a Senate committee that President Nixon had tape recorded everything.

The FBI may now have access to all of Hillary’s emails, including the thousands upon thousands that were deleted by her and her minions, and probably some that the FBI had no idea ever existed. There may be emails related to Benghazi in the new documents; there may be damning emails to and from President Obama.

President Clinton was nearly destroyed because of a vagina and a blue dress; Hillary’s charge to power may be stopped by a Weiner. It all seems a rather fitting punishment for the Clinton crime family, particularly after Hillary’s campaign has so blatantly smeared Donald Trump with bought women and false accusations of sexual assault.

As Clinton’s campaign takes a sudden nose dive with less than two weeks till the election, warrants have been issued, raids are likely, and Democrat officials and Hillary supporters are left with probably nothing they can do to save their candidate except to try to deflect attention back onto Comey.

Comey, who in July let Clinton walk away, seeming Scot-free, by refusing to call for an indictment of the former secretary of state, despite a lengthy public presentation demonstrating clearly that if it had been anybody but Clinton, they would have been rocking an orange jumpsuit.

The fix was in. The whole country knew it. The Democrats hailed Comey’s dive. The media pretended that justice was done. But everybody knew that the investigation findings were never going to be taken seriously, and the whole deal had been settled a few days previous, when Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch just “happened” to bump into each other at a regional airport … inside a private plane … and discussed grandchildren … and golf.

What’s more, the FBI’s agents knew what Comey had done, what Lynch had done, what the Clintons had done and were about to do to the whole country.

So the country’s loyal FBI agents did what employees will do to get back at a boss they no longer respect. They undermined him, they ignored him, they yelled at him, they wrote letters of resignation that formed a high pile on his desk, they shunned him. They made it clear that he had brought shame on all of them, on the agency, and himself.

Don’t expect Democrats to tell you the truth about that, either. In the newly minted panic narrative, Trump and Russia are somehow to blame, and Comey is a lone operative, a rogue gone mad with power.

According to that narrative, Comey is a criminal who violated the Hatch Act regulations against bureaucrats trying to influence an election. A criminal, for defying Lynch and finally doing his job.

Top Senate Democrat and “creepy clown” Harry Reid said it. House Intelligence Committee ranking member Rep. Adam Schiff said it. Heck, Judge Jeanine Pirro said it. Basically, everybody who has ever been on a Democratic mailing list or the Media Matters morning memo is saying it, using the preapproved language crafted in the DNC headquarters and the White House basement.

As usual, the Democrats’ song and dance is all about deflection.

Instead of trying to blame the FBI director for attempting to make up for his huge error in July, the Democrats might try, just this once, putting blame where it belongs: on themselves and Hillary Clinton.

The way things work in Washington, Comey will probably land behind bars long before Clinton does. At the very least, his career’s over. Maybe he’ll think it’s worth it, to protect this country from the reign of the Clinton criminal network.

By all rights, Clinton should step down from her position as the Democratic nominee. She has no place being on the ballot.


God bless,
JohnnyD

'The Most Important Election In Global History'

Pastor Carl Gallups, author of "When the Lion Roars," on the existential stakes of 2016

From: World Net Daily


This time, it really is the most important election in history.

Carl Gallups, author of the explosive new eschatological sensation "When the Lion Roars: Understanding the Implications of Ancient Prophecies for Our Time," claimed the contest between Donald Trump's nationalism and Hillary Clinton's globalism is even more important than other critical elections, such as that of 1864, because it is taking place during the most prophetically significant time since the first coming of Christ.

"The Civil War election was probably the most profound in the history of our nation, but what makes this different is that now we’re living on the other side of the return of Israel," Gallups stated in a recent appearance on "The Jim Bakker Show." "The prophecy clock started ticking. Then Israel regains Jerusalem. Now the Middle East is on fire. China is in the Middle East. Russia is in the Middle East. Turkey and Russia are kind of working together. Israel is sitting there in the midst of it.

"The World Wide Web has been turned over to the globalists. We now have an explosion of technology that connects the whole world. We're becoming the Tower of Babel again. And on top of all of that, we have this election between a globalist and a nationalist. This is the most important election in the history of the world because it stands in the middle of the most prophetic times the world has ever seen since the first coming of Jesus Christ."

Gallups argued America has always been under threat from spiritual forces dedicated to destroying the country.

"Ever since America was born, there have been dark, demonic forces manifest in the political realm out to bring America down," Gallups said. "From the day it was born, Satan has come against it. Now, we are living in these last days, these prophetically profound days. The church and Israel are the targets ... and every demonic force is coming against Israel and the church. And the United States of America stands as the bastion of both of those. And Satan hates us."

Gallups identified "globalists" as the key force behind the anti-America agenda. He pointed out how ruling elites support phenomena such as Islamization, even though it threatens the very things progressives supposedly value.

"Shariah cannot exist side-by-side with our Constitution or with our Judeo-Christian foundation and heritage," Gallups said. "But it also doesn't exist with the progressive liberal agenda, so called. It doesn't exist side-by-side with women's rights, for example. It doesn't exist side-by-side with homosexual rights. It doesn't exist side-by-side with all of these major agendas of the progressive left. And people are scratching their heads, saying, 'Why are they protecting it?' Because they're using it.

"We scratch our heads at what's going in Washington, wondering how can this be. Well, that's what it is. There is a globalist agenda, and standing in the way of that entire thing right now is the Christian constitutional republic that is America. The number one superpower in the world. Up until recently, the number one economic agenda of the world. The most prosperous, the most promising nation in the world. We're standing there as a constitutional republic with the largest Christian population in the world, or at least people professing to be Christians. And we're standing in the way of this globalist agenda. And the globalists can taste it! They're so close, they've destroyed so much all over the world."

The pastor maintained many of the culture-war issues roiling American politics are really just political weapons being used to break down American culture and remove the ability of the nation to defend its sovereignty.

"They're using Islam," Gallups said of the globalists. "They're using the radical homosexual agenda. The globalists don't give a rip about the homosexuals. But they're using the radical agenda to destroy the fabric and the foundation because America is the prize.

"America stands in the way. America props up Israel. America props up the gospel message throughout the world. America props up freedom for Christian conservatives to do what we're doing. And they will use Islam, they will use homosexuality, they will use the transgender issue, they will use whatever issue they can to divide us, to conquer us, to destroy us."

However, Gallups said there is one figure the globalists and the power elite never counted on. And that is Donald J. Trump.

"Donald Trump represents the wrecking ball to all of that," he said. "And they're terrified of him. That's what’s going on."

Gallups, a former law enforcement official, said it was especially troubling how President Obama so casually handed over control of the Internet to global authorities. Unfortunately, the pastor said, patriotic Americans today have to doubt the intentions of their own leaders.

"How can it be that the president turned over the Internet, our lifeline to communication?" Gallups asked rhetorically. "How can it be that our government won't fix the infrastructure? How can it be that Republican establishment are saying we'd rather have Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump? These things don't make sense in the America we used to know.

"The answer is this. It's a little heartbreaking, but here's the answer – these people, the president, the establishment, they're not for us. That's why they don't do anything for America. They are not for us. They are for the global agenda. That's why they're terrified of Donald Trump. That's why this election is the most important in world history."


God bless,
JohnnyD

Chicago Tribune To Hillary Clinton – Time To Step Down And Leave Race!

From: WayneDupree

by - Wayne Dupree 



Just a couple of months ago, the Chicago Tribune was writing glaring stories of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and placing her on a bully pulpit for everyone to see and admire. How times have changed. Hillary has proven to everyone that she has no real sense of right and wrong. She appeases what’s in front of her instead of having any convictions. That’s why there are two answers; she can’t remember. Any law-abiding citizen should be appalled our leaders are so corrupt!

On Saturday evening, the Tribune asked Hillary to step down after the entire circus that has followed her to included an FBI investigation that was just re-opened on Friday with new possible evidence. Clinton has proven to everyone that she has no real sense of right and wrong. She appeases what’s in front of her instead of having any convictions. Any law-abiding citizen should be appalled our leaders are so corrupt!

One of the largest remaining newspapers in the country has asked Hillary to step down. That’s huge in itself because she’s from Chicago and they are a liberal publication. They carry a lot of weight in Democratic circles so things must be superbad, don’t you think?

It’s obvious the American political system is breaking down. It’s been crumbling for some time now, and the establishment elite knows it, and they’re properly frightened. Donald Trump, the vulgarian at their gates, is a symptom, not a cause. Hillary Clinton and husband Bill are both cause and effect.

FBI Director James Comey’s announcement about the renewed Clinton email investigation is the bombshell in the presidential campaign. That he announced this so close to Election Day should tell every thinking person that what the FBI is looking at is extremely serious.

This can’t be about pervert Anthony Weiner and his reported desire for a teenage girl. But it can be about the laptop of Weiner’s wife, Clinton aide Huma Abedin, and emails between her and Hillary. It comes after the FBI investigation in which Comey concluded Clinton had lied and been “reckless” with national secrets, but said he could not recommend prosecution.

So what should the Democrats do now?

If ruling Democrats hold themselves to the high moral standards they impose on the people they govern, they would follow a simple process:

They would demand that Mrs. Clinton step down, immediately, and let her vice presidential nominee, Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, stand in her place.

He’s not wrong; this election has been an embarrassment filled with email scandals, voter fraud and racist undertones from both parties (taco bowl outreach from the DNC). How did we get so messed up!

This may just be the most powerful, to the point article that I’ve read during the entire campaign. Kudos to John Kass of the Chicago Tribune for not becoming just another sheep in the mainstream media that have allowed themselves to be influenced and controlled by the powers to be.


God bless,
JohnnyD