CHARLIE DANIELS: Wrote an Open Letter to Obama

From: Clash Daily

Posted on June 12, 2015


This scathing open letter, which was posted on Charlie Daniels’ own website, expresses the sentiments that most freedom loving Americans have towards Obama. Read it and then share with everyone you know:

Dear Mr. President,

This letter is not written in a spirit of hate, disrespect, nor is it motivated in any way by racial bias and is written with respect due the office and the awesome tasks that have been laid on your shoulders.

I write this letter because I am a tax paying American citizen who has experienced the American Dream and wants his children and grandchildren to have the same advantages and opportunities that he has had.

And no, Mr. President, I was not born into a one-percenter family, I come from a blue collar background, never went to college, have made a living doing manual labor and went into my chosen profession at ground level, worked hard and sacrificed to achieve success.

On April 13, 1967 I arrived in Nashville, Tennessee with a wife, a two-year-old baby, a twenty-dollar bill and the clutch out of my car.

I won’t go into the mountains and valleys that I’ve traveled since then except to say that I have been successful and somebody did help me build the business I own. Almighty God, not the government.

I employ thirty people, good citizens and family people, hard-working people, the kind of gun-clinging, God-fearing folks who make America the greatest nation the world has ever known.

Mr. President, it seems to me that you have little faith in American ingenuity, American capability, American exceptionalism and even American patriotism.

You seem to think that America needs a monolithic, big brother type government to oversee and regulate every aspect of American life, that citizens are not competent to control their own affairs and make their own decisions without some oppressive bureaucracy to call the shots.

Mr. President, the answer is not government, conversely, the problem is government. A government that has doubled the national debt, increased unemployment, lowered take home pay, increased food stamp participation and disability claims and introduced socialized medicine.

You support teacher’s unions which take political activism more seriously than education.

You intentionally lied to the American people about your stand on marriage being between a man and woman, and continue to lie when it is politically expedient for you to do so.

You surround yourself with inexperienced ideologues and political yes men and take the advice of individuals who are swimming in waters way too deep for them.

Your petulance is unbecoming, Mr. President, and your criticism of anyone who disagrees with you is downright unmanly. You come off like a spoiled child who has been denied his way.

And while you blame your shortcomings on opposing political parties, you had both houses of Congress and the White House in the first two years of your term. Plus an electoral mandate to do just about anything you wanted to, so the least you can do is cowboy up and take the blame for the messes you’ve made.

Your apparent disregard for the maintenance and morale of our armed services is extremely unwise and dangerous.

Mr. President, the office you hold is not a place for the faint of heart and when you draw a red line you’d dang well better be willing to back it up, because when you don’t every tyrant and despot in this world takes it for a sign of weakness and will take advantage, Putin and China being a prime example.

In making any kind of deal with Iran you spit in the face of Israel and plant the seeds of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

The last report showed that the US economy actually shrunk by .07% while the national debt and other obligations grow by the day.

No matter how many apologists come forth and no matter how much double talk you and the puppets who speak for you come up with, the greatest nation the world has ever known is losing a war with a small army of criminals and thugs that grows bigger every day simply because you don’t have the guts to face the problem.

You’re running out of diversions Mr. President, sleight of hand political policies eventually stop working and lies finally float to the top of water.

Time is running out for you Mr. President and the horrible thing about it is that time is running out for America too.

What do you think?

Pray for our troops and the peace of Jerusalem.

God Bless America
Charlie Daniels


God bless,
JohnnyD
 

Left Exploits Mental Illness to Push PC Agenda

From: Town Hall Daily

by - Ben Shapiro  6/3/2015


My grandfather was deeply mentally ill. He spent nearly a year in a psychiatric institution after being diagnosed with bipolar disorder; he heard the radio talking to him. He became suicidal. He spent years battling the condition, until he was prescribed lithium. For the next several decades, the medication brought his mental illness under control.

Nothing would have been crueler to my grandfather than had society told him that his delusions were correct -- that the radio was, in fact, talking to him; that the curtains were indeed threatening him; that he was normal, and that it was the stereotypes of the world inducing his paranoia.

Yet that is the view of the anti-science left that this week declared former Olympic champion Bruce Jenner a woman. Vanity Fair led the way, featuring Jenner wearing a one-piece corset, Photoshopped and made up beyond nearly all recognition. The 22-page profile of Jenner insists that everyone call him Caitlyn, addresses him as "she," and explains that despite the fact that Jenner has all male genitalia and all male genetics, he is in fact a woman -- even though the writer explains his own confusion as to gender pronoun usage.

Jenner freely admits that he had doubts right after having his face surgically altered in a 10-hour procedure, but that a counselor from the Los Angeles Gender Center explained it was just the painkillers talking (it would be illegal in California for a counselor to explain to Jenner that he requires serious mental illness treatment beyond bodily mutilation). Jenner also admits that he is doing a reality television show about his sex change for the money: "I'm not doing it for money. ... If I can make a dollar, I certainly am not stupid. [I have] house payments and all that kind of stuff."

It's cruel to allow a mentally ill person to exploit himself in public, but the political left is happy to do so in order to perpetuate the pseudo-scientific nonsense that a man can magically turn into a woman. Their agenda: If men and women are the same but for hormone therapy, implants and repeated surgical intervention, then all disparities between male and female can be attributed to societal biases. And those societally created "gender constructs" can be corrected only by massive government intervention, including re-education of children. Bruce Jenner is merely a tool in this quest for redefinition of gender.

Thus, the White House hailed Jenner as a hero, with presidential advisor Valerie Jarrett tweeting, "Nice to meet you, @Caitlyn_Jenner. The brave choice to live as your authentic self is a powerful example to so many." Except that Caitlyn certainly isn't Jenner's "authentic self," any more than the "authentic self" of an anorexic requires constant liposuction. Surgery is not the solution to mental illness. The post-surgical suicide rate among transgenders remains 20 times higher than that of the general population.

As Dr. Paul McHugh, former psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital, wrote last year, "'Sex change' is biologically impossible. People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women. Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder."

And promoting mental disorders hurts no one more than those who suffer from such disorders. Delusions ought not be supported, let alone celebrated. They ought to be treated.


God bless,
JohnnyD
 

IT TAKES A VILLAGE

 

IT TAKES A VILLAGE

 

TO ELECT THE VILLAGE IDIOT.......

God bless,
JohnnyD

GOD'S Warning to America

From: America the Battlefield

by - Timothy A. Pope May 6, 2015

On Wednesday, April 29, 2015, Messianic Jewish Rabbi, Jonathan Cahn, spoke at the fourth annual Washington—A Man of Prayer event held at the U.S. Capitol, delivered on the 226th anniversary of the inauguration of President George Washington. Cahn's sermon in Washington was the most anointed prophetic utterance he has ever given, and many members of the Congress were in attendance.

In Rabbi Cahn's best-selling 2012 Christian novel, The Harbinger, which spent a record-breaking 100 weeks as a New York Times best-seller, he suggested that the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 was a divine warning to the United States, tying the 9/11 attacks to the prophetic warning in Isaiah 9:10 attributed to the pride and rebellion of the nation's leaders in defiance of God.

The Harbinger inspired the best-selling documentary, The Isaiah 9:10 Judgment, produced by WND Films, which proves conclusively that America is under divine judgment for turning away from God, just as ancient Israel did before being taken into captivity. 

Here is Jonathan Cahn delivering a fiery warning to the American people and our leaders in Washington about what will happen to this country if the Supreme Court dares to defy Almighty God and His divinely-ordained, pre-existing natural Law:

Open in YouTube: http://youtu.be/6WCkl7ToRq0 (8:53)

 

Here is a transcript of Rabbi Cahn's message in Washington:

It is April 29, 2015. Two hundred and twenty-six years ago this day, George Washington readied himself for the first ever presidential inauguration, to take place the following day—the day America as we know it came into existence, with the President's hand resting on the Word of God. That day would conclude with America's first government gathering in prayer to dedicate the nation's future to God.   A century and a half earlier, another seminal event took place on the same day. On April 29, 1607, the voyagers on the Susan Constant, the Discovery, and the Godspeed, gathered together in prayer at Cape Henry to set a wooden cross in the sands of Virginia Beach, and dedicate the new civilization to the will and purposes of God. 

America's biblical foundation would be affirmed and reaffirmed over and over again by its forefathers, from the Pilgrims of the Mayflower, to the Puritans of Massachusetts Bay, to the leaders of the first American colonies who declared publicly and in writing that the new Commonwealth had come into existence solely for the glory and purposes of God. 

No historian can rewrite that. No president can expunge that. And if a thousand angels swore on a thousand Bibles that this was not the case, it would in no way alter the fact that this American civilization was conceived, established, dedicated, and founded on a biblical cornerstone—America was brought into existence for the will and purpose of God. 

On this night, over two hundred years ago, George Washington held in his hand the first ever presidential address. In that address was a prophetic warning. It was this: "The propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of Order and Right which Heaven itself hath ordained." In other words, if America should ever turn away from God and His ways, if it should ever disregard His eternal rules of Order and Right, then His blessings, the smiles of Heaven, would be removed from the land. 

It was an ancient warning. It had been given in Hebrew words by the prophets to the kingdom of Israel. But Israel turned away from God and disregarded His eternal rules of Order and Right. 

They drove God out of their government, out of their public squares, out of their culture, out of the lives of their children; they worshiped idols and served other gods. They celebrated immorality and they persecuted the righteous. They lifted up their children on the altars of foreign gods. And the blessings of God were removed from the land and replaced by judgment. 

It is two and half thousand years later, and America has made the same mistake. We, too, have turned away from God. We, too, have driven Him out of the government, out of our public square, out of our culture, out of the lives of our children. We, too, have profaned the sacred and sanctified the profane. And we, too, have killed our most innocent—over fifty-five million of our unborn children—and our collective hands are covered with blood. What we were warned never to do, we now have done. 

And now we gather in the city named after the one who gave that prophetic warning. And yesterday, in this city, in the building that sits across from this hill, the Justices of the Supreme Court took up their places on the bench to decide whether America should strike down the biblical and historic definition of marriage. The very fact that that event should take place as such is a sign in itself, that this is the America of Washington's warning. It's here, and this day of which he warned is now. 

We have become a civilization in spiritual schizophrenia, a nation at war against its own foundation. The Supreme Court opens its sessions with the words: "God save the United States and this Honorable Court." But if then—if this honorable court should overrule the word of God and strike down the eternal rules of Order and Right that Heaven itself hath ordained, how then will God save it? 

Supreme Court Justices, can you judge the ways of God? Can you, with manmade verdicts, overrule the eternal laws of God? There is another court, and there is another Judge. And before Him, all men and all judges will give account. If a nation's high court should pass judgment on the Almighty, should you then be surprised if the Almighty should pass judgment on that court and that nation? 
In the Book of Jeremiah, it is written: "Has a nation ever exchanged its gods? Yet my people have exchanged their glory for that which cannot help them." Let us not pretend as to what we are now doing. We are doing that which Israel did on the altars of Baal. We are exchanging our God for idols, our light for darkness, and our glory for that which cannot save us. Are we ready to risk that which comes on the other side of that exchange, the day when the blessings of Heaven are removed from the land? 

We began with a word from the President of our first nation's—or the day that he began as President. I now speak a word to the President of our nation's most recent days. Each time I have spoken here, I have asked a question. I'll now answer it. Mr. President, with all respect that is due, what happens if one assumes the presidency by placing his left hand on the Word of God, and then, with his right hand, enacts laws that war against the very same Word of God on which he laid his hand? Such an act invokes the judgment of the Almighty.

To swear an Oath on the Word of God in which it is written "Defend the weak" and "Do not murder," and to then to not defend the weak, to not protect the unborn, but, instead, to advance their murder, is to invoke the judgment of the Almighty. 

To swear an Oath on the Word of God, in which its written, "Do not cause your brother to stumble," and then to seek to force those who uphold the Word of God to transgress the Word of God, by partaking in the killing of the unborn and the celebration of sin, is to invoke the judgment of the Almighty. 

And to swear an Oath on the Word of God, in which its written, "Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people," and then to take part in the leading of a nation away from "the eternal rules of Order and Right that Heaven itself hath ordained," and against the very Word of God on which you laid your hand, is to invoke the judgment of the Almighty. 

When the leaders of ancient Israel turned away from God, when they abolished His precepts, and broke His covenant, they did so in the shadow of Moses, whose voice cried out to them in warning. 

Mr. President, when you address the nation from this house, look up. Look up above the Senators and Representatives, above the Supreme Court Justices, and above the invited guests, and you will see a face—the only full visage in that wall—looking back at you. It is the face of Moses. 

And if that face could speak, it would say this: "No man can overrule the laws of God, no order can annul the order of God, and no judgment of man can stand against the judgments of God. Invoke not His judgment, but choose life. Lead in the way of repentance. Invoke the grace of God, that He might have mercy on this land." 

We have come to a most critical moment. As Elijah stood on top of Mount Carmel and cried out to Israel in its hour of decision, in between two altars and two gods, his voice now cries out to America and says: "Choose you this day whom you will serve." Seventy years ago, the Chaplain of the United States Senate cried out in the same voice, and said to this nation, "If the Lord be God, then follow Him! But if Baal, then follow him and go to hell!" 

Tonight, America stands at the crossroads. And as Elijah came to the summit of Mount Carmel to make a declaration, we have come this night to Capitol Hill to declare that our god is not Baal. Our god is not Molech. Our god is not the government. Our god is not money. Our god is not power; not pleasure. Our god is not political correctness or any other man-made thing. 

We have come to this hill to declare that there is only one God, and He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He is the God of Israel and of all nations. He alone is the Rock upon which this nation has come into existence. 

And from this high place we make this declaration: "We will not bow down our knees to Baal. We will not bow down our knees to political correctness. We will not bow down our knees to a morality that is as shifting as sand in the wind. We will not bow down our knees to the laws and precepts of rebellion or to the sacred cows of moral apostasy. We will not bow down our knees to the idols of man. We will not bow down to Baal. We will bow down our knees only to the Lord our God, come what may, and we will have no other gods before Him."

For some trust in chariots, and some trust in princes, some trust in supreme courts, some trust in White Houses, some trust in governments, some trust in Wall Streets, some trust in powers, and some trust in idols. 

But we will trust in the name of the Lord our God, the name above all names, above all kings, above all powers. We will trust in the only name given by which we can be saved. 

We will trust in the name of Yeshua HaMashiach, Jesus the Messiah, the King of all kings, the Lord of all lords, the Judge of all judges, the Light of the World, the Glory of Israel, the Foundation Stone upon which this nation came into existence, and the only answer, the only chance, and the only hope America has, that it might once again shine with the light of the fire of the presence of the glory of the Living God, and not go to hell, so help us, God.

God bless,
JohnnyD

PS: If you have no read the book "The Harbinger", READ IT!

Prominent M.D.: 'Gender confusion' a fleeting mental disorder

From: One News Now

by - Michael F. Haverluck  - Thursday, April 30, 2015


Throwing another monkey wrench in homosexual activists' claim that there is a "gay" gene — that homosexual behavior manifests from a biological condition rather than from a choice — a prominent psychiatrist argues that gender confusion is a temporary mental disorder that leads to suicidal tendencies, if nurtured.

According to former Johns Hopkins Hospital psychiatrist-in-chief Paul R. McHugh, M.D., a person changing the sex he or she was born with is "biologically impossible." He went on to declare that LGBT advocates who encourage "gender confused" individuals to have "sexual reassignment surgery" are guiding them down the path to suffer from mental illness — and quite possibly, suicide — WND reports.

30 years of research doesn't lie

McHugh points to a Swedish study tracking "transgenders" — some for nearly three decades — stressing how the decision often celebrated in the media to go through sex changes often proves fatal because of the mental toll it takes on indivuals.

"[B]eginning about ten years after having the surgery, the transgendered began to experience increasing mental difficulties," McHugh wrote in the Wall Street Journal about the research. "Most shockingly, their suicide mortality rose almost 20-fold above the comparable non-transgender population."

Corroborating his assertion about the ephemeral nature of transgender proclivities, McHugh points to research showing that transgenderism is a choice — not a hereditary biological trait.

"When children who reported transgender feelings were tracked without medical or surgical treatment at both Vanderbilt University and London's Portman Clinic, 70 percent to 80 percent of them spontaneously lost those feelings," McHugh shared.

Just as the military has worked actively to normalize homosexual behavior under the directive of the Obama administration, which did away with the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, it is argued that the LGBT community is doing all it can to push transgenderism into the mainstream.

Obama sent us down this track

When Barack Obama took office in 2009, only a few states legalized same-sex marriage. Today, 37 states recognize the controversial unions (mostly through court edicts), with the U.S. Supreme Court kicking off hearings this week that could end up legalizing it across all 50 states. Many believe that with a victory there, the LGBT community would start moving on to new horizons.

Massachusetts became the first state to legalize the "gay" marriage in 2004, when only 30 percent supported the much-debated unions, compared to nearly double that rate today (59 percent), according to the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll taken last month. It was also reported that Republican support for "gay" marriage increased from 27 percent two years ago to 40 percent today. The highest support of the controversial unions comes from Democrats and the 18- to 34-year-old age bracket, both registering at 74 percent.

All aboard … a train of lies to destruction?

The Center for Marriage Policy president David Usher says the promotion of the transgender movement is strategically riding on the wave of same-sex "marriage" sweeping the nation.

Usher contends that since the media has ramped up its LGBT support under the Obama administration, the next phase of its attack on family values will end in the destruction of hundreds of youths' lives who embrace its lie about "transgenderism" and taking it to the next level.

"I'm just wondering what planet I'm living on now, but this is all basically straight out of (Alfred) Kinsey (the famous sexologist)," Usher expressed, according to WND. "The whole concept is that one's biological sex is completely immaterial. That's just the next phase of the sexual liberation movement, to make it so physical sex means absolutely nothing."

Usher calls the LGBT community's spin on divergent sexualities "junk science," saying that its mind-over-matter philosophy departs from reality, inciting homosexual advocates to embrace an imaginary world tailored to what they would like to believe.

"And basically we live in an age when reality just doesn't matter anymore," Usher continued. "What is, isn't. This is basically liberals trying to bring in the last stage of cultural destruction laid out by Herbert Marcuse."

WND reports that Marcuse gave a glimpse of what America can expect in the future if it continues to embrace the LGBT agenda.

"Marcuse was a German-American philosopher, sociologist and political theorist associated with the Frankfurt School of critical theory," WND informed. "This school taught that it was necessary to advance the theories of Karl Marx beyond economics into the realm of sociology and culture. It was the crossing of Marx with Freud."

William Lind, an American cultural conservative columnist, elaborates on how the connection ties into what's going on today in the sexual revolution taking place across the U. S.

"Just as classical economic Marxism argued that under capitalism the working class was oppressed, so the Frankfurt school used Freud to argue that under Western culture everyone lived in a constant state of psychological repression," William Lind expressed in a Free Congress Foundation documentary.

Usher identifies what's taking place as parallel to a Marxist ploy to destroy the American family and religious organizations as currently known in the U.S. to bring about a new order rooted in secularism and extreme materialism — a movement often identified as "cultural terrorism."

"This is the socialist mindset," Usher concluded. "If you can destroy the meaning of what it means to be a woman or a man, then the whole country is up for grabs."


God bless,
JohnnyD
 

Hillary Clinton and the Death of Truth in Liberal America

From: Conservative HQ

by - George Rasley, CHQ Editor | 4/27/2015


In the conservativehq.com article “A Congress of Lies” posted November 11, 2011 CHQ Chairman Richard A. Viguerie made the point that “The Tea Party rebellion came into being in large measure due to the perception among middle class taxpayers that America’s major establishment institutions were corrupt -- and there is no more compelling evidence of just how far the American political system has been corrupted by Washington’s insider culture, than how common and accepted lying has become among the political elite of Capitol Hill.”

Our friend Diana West, author of two “must read” books, American Betrayal and The Death of the Grown-Up, makes and develops a similar point, concluding that over the past 80 years or so Americans have developed a strange inability to become adults who render judgments of right and wrong. 

West makes a persuasive case that the root of this malaise began with Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s recognition of the Soviet Union and the body of lies that Americans have been fed ever since to justify normalizing a relationship with the abnormal.

West and Viguerie share a similar conclusion about the effect the endemic lying which now corrupts practically every aspect of American politics and culture, which West defines as “…this moral surrender to deception and self-deception that sent us down the long road to moral relativism, ‘political correctness,’ and other cultural ills that have left us unable to ask the hard questions…”

The latest, and perhaps final chapter of this surrender to moral relativism, and the elimination of allegiance to objective fact as the standard by which all matters must be judged, is playing out in the rapidly evolving scandal regarding foreign government contributions to the Clinton Foundation, Bill Clinton’s speaking fees and policy-making by Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State as documented in Peter Schweizer's new book “Clinton Cash.”

Objectively, as far as we can tell from the pre-release excerpts published in establishment and conservative outlets, there is a wealth of facts indicating that Hillary Clinton violated the Memorandum of Understanding she had with the State Department and the Obama administration regarding the conduct of her relationship with the Clinton Foundation and its donors.

Objectively, as far as we can tell from the pre-release excerpts published in establishment and conservative outlets, there is a wealth of facts indicating that Hillary Clinton violated the constitutional and statutory prohibitions against accepting gifts from foreign governments.

None of these facts seem to interest Democratic Party elected officials and Party operatives who should have some allegiance to the higher interests of their Party and its principles.

None of these facts seem to interest major figures in the liberal sisterhood of powerful female media personalities, academics, activists and donors who make-up the core of Hillary Clinton’s political base.

And even more worryingly, none of these facts seem to interest major figures in the establishment media, such as former Clinton spokesman, now ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos.

As our friend Matt Boyle put it in his coverage of Peter Schweizer’s appearance* on ABC News’ This Week, Stephanopoulos was “floored” as two prominent journalists and the Republican Speaker of the House from his Clinton days, Newt Gingrich, laid out for him during a segment of the show just how bad the “Clinton Cash” book is for his old bosses.

During the show’s roundtable panel after "Clinton Cash" author Peter Schweizer appeared for a lengthy interview, Stephanopoulos teamed with Democratic strategist Donna Brazile (a leading member of the liberal sisterhood backing Hillary Clinton) in an attempt to discredit Schweizer.

Brazile admitted she doesn’t know what’s in the book. Yet, without having read it, she proceeded to drop a series of rhetorical attacks on Schweizer. She also offered the Clinton campaign advice on how to attempt to get past Clinton Cash.

“Well, George, I haven’t read the whole book—I’m sure it’s still being rewritten somewhere because the newspapers and other publications are already disputing some of the facts and the claims in his book,” Brazile said according to Boyle’s reporting. “But there are more drippings in this book than juice or sauce and what the campaign needs to do—and they did it last week—is go ahead and respond to these allegations. They’re scurrilous. We’re going to see more of them as the campaign goes along but respond to them and continue to reach out to voters and ignore all of this background noise. That’s what they need to do.”

When Newt Gingrich, a member of that segment’s panel said, “Look, this isn’t a political problem—this is a historical problem,” Gingrich said. “The Constitution of the United States says you cannot take money from foreign governments without explicit permission of the Congress. They wrote that in there because they knew the danger of corrupting our system by foreign money is enormous.

“You had a sitting Secretary of State who radically increased his speech fees and there is a whole series of dots on the wall now where people gave millions of dollars who oh, by the way, happened to get taken care of by the State Department. You raised a good standard.

“And of course, having been on the Watergate Committee, she knew exactly what to do. She erased 33,000 emails. Richard Nixon only erased 18 minutes. So you’re going to have a prima facie case that any jury would look at…”

Stephanopoulos and Brazile flatly refused to countenance any notion that what Hillary and Bill Clinton did presented a prima facie appearance of illegality; they refused to even accept that it was wrong for a government official to accept money from a foreign government.

To his great credit Gingrich continued to press the point. “My point is they took money from foreign governments while she was Secretary of State—that is clearly illegal,” Gingrich said. “This is not about politics. It’s illegal. It’s dangerous to America to have foreign governments get in the habit of bribing people who happen to be the husband of the Secretary of State or next president of the United States.”

“I think there’s a very simple case here—the Constitution says you can’t take this stuff, we have federal laws that say you can’t take this stuff,” Gingrich said. “If this was any person but Hillary Clinton, they’d be under indictment right now for a clearly straightforward problem.”

Bloomberg Politics’ Mark Halperin wrote what might well be the final epitaph for the death of objective truth among Democrats this way, “almost any Democrat who’s not Clintons’ payroll will tell reporters and others privately that these are serious issues,” but they are so corrupted by the death of truth and what Diana West calls “normalizing the abnormal” that, as far as we can tell, as of today none of have come out publicly and said the conduct of Bill and Hillary Clinton documented by Peter Schweizer in “Clinton Cash,” whether or not it is illegal, is wrong.

And if what’s documented in “Clinton Cash” isn’t wrong to Democrats, then nothing Bill and Hillary Clinton might do in the White House will be wrong either.

Please click the link to read Matt Boyle's article "Stephanopoulos Floored As Gingrich, Bloomberg Editors Detail Seriousness Of 'Clinton Cash'"


God bless,
JohnnyD

The real reason for Obama's executive amnesty

Limbaugh: 'These efforts behind the scenes are taking place even now'

 

From: World Net Daily-  4-27-15

 

 

The Obama administration is facing new accusations that the president’s amnesty-for-illegals program is focused on getting enough immigrants to  register as Democrat voters to keep his party in power in 2016.
 
According to J. Christian Adams, a former Department of Justice attorney who writes at PJ Media, President Obama’s “amnesty by edict has always been about adding new Democrats to the voter rolls, and recent action by the Department of Homeland Security provides further proof.
 
“Sources at the Department of Homeland Security report to PJ Media that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services is reallocating significant resources away from a computer system – the ‘Electronic Immigration System’ – to sending letters to all 9,000,000 green card holders urging them to naturalize prior to the 2016 election.”
 
He cites a CIS letter about the urgency of having “people who live in this country” participating “fully” in their communities.
 
Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh jumped on the issue Monday.
 
“You know the objective is to get them to vote,” he said.

 

“The objective all along here has been the registration of illegal aliens as Democrats. That’s gonna happen one way or the other. That’s what all of this talk is about. What’s newsworthy here is that it has been learned that the Department of Homeland Security is mobilizing now to essentially create 9 million new registered Democrats by the 2016 election among current green-card holders.”

He continued: “They’re putting everything in place so that when Obama decides to go executive amnesty, it’s not the beginning of any process, it’s just the period. It’s just the last thing to happen. … In fact, it’ll be the end of the process of getting them registered to vote because while Obama is waiting to sign [executive amnesty], these efforts going on behind the scenes to get these people registered [are] taking place EVEN NOW.”

 

Adams cited a recent letter signed by Leon Rodriguez, co-chairman of the Task Force on New Americans, on the letterhead of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

 

Rodriguez, Adams said, “has a tainted history – not only was he a central player in the radicalization of Eric Holder’s Civil Rights Division, he also ‘undertook a purportedly illegal search’ of a government employee’s computer in Montgomery County, Maryland. (Messy details are at the Washington Post.)”

 

The letter cites the White House task force regarding new Americans.

 

“This report outlines an immigrant integration plan that will advance our nation’s global competitiveness and ensure that the people who live in this country can fully participate in their communities.”

 

Wrote Adams: “‘Full participation’ is a term commonly used to include voting rights. To that end, resources within DHS have been redirected toward pushing as many aliens and non-citizens as possible to full citizenship status so they may ‘fully participate’ in the 2016 presidential election. For example, the internal DHS letter states one aim is to ‘strengthen existing pathways to naturalization and promote civic engagement.’”

 

Adams said naturalization plus mobilization is the explicit aim of the’Task Force on New Americans.

 

“Multiple sources at DHS confirm that political appointees are prioritizing naturalization ahead of the 2016 presidential election,” he said.

 

He noted that voting patterns reveal new voters overwhelmingly choose Democrat candidates.

 

“If the empirical rates of support for Democrats continued among these newly naturalized minority voters, Democrats could enjoy an electoral net benefit of millions of new voters in the 2016 presidential election.”

 

Adams explained: “One DHS official who disagrees with the administration’s policies told me DHS ‘intends to ‘recapture’ ‘unused’ visas from years past to grant more visas and LPR [green card] status. In addition to this ‘visa blizzard,’ the agency will allow folks to jam in applications during the blizzard, knowing that the visa applicant/beneficiary is not eligible for the visa.”

 

A large part of Obama’s program has been ordered to a halt by a federal judge in Texas. The Obama administration has appealed the order to the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

 

God bless,

JohnnyD