OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT WORKS ONLY AS WELL AS THE PEOPLE WHO PARTICIPATE IN IT.

FREEDOM IS NEVER MORE THAN A GENERATION AWAY FROM EXTINCTION.
-Ronald Reagan

BAD LEGISLATORS ARE THE PRODUCT OF GOOD AMERICANS THAT DO NOT VOTE.

ANY INTELLIGENT FOOL CAN MAKE THINGS BIGGER, MORE COMPLEX, AND MORE VIOLENT. IT TAKES A TOUCH OF GENIUS AND A LOT OF COURAGE TO MOVE IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.
-Albert Einstein

“THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL NEVER KNOWINGLY ADOPT SOCIALISM. BUT UNDER THE NAME OF ‘LIBERALISM’ THEY WILL ADOPT EVERY FRAGMENT OF THE SOCIALIST PROGRAM UNTIL ONE DAY AMERICA WILL BE A SOCIALIST NATION, WITHOUT KNOWING HOW IT HAPPENED.”
- Norman Thomas, a founder of the A.C.L.U.

SO, LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT, IF GUNS KILL PEOPLE, I GUESS PENCILS MISSPELL WORDS, CARS DRIVE DRUNK, AND SPOONS MAKE PEOPLE FAT!
-The liberal thinking process never ceases to amaze me.

Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

The Biggest Hack Yet! More Hillary DNC

Guccifer 2.0 Leaks DNC 'Pay-To-Play' Donor List


From: The Political Insider

by - Kosar


The infamous hacker Guccifer 2.0 has released emails that show the Democratic National Committee selling ambassadorships.

Now, for the first time, we see just how much it costs to be an Ambassador for President Barack Obama, and what Hillary was charging for her potential administration.

This is over 500 megabytes of documents, which shows the details of more than 100,000 DNC donors’ contact information. Many of those on the list have top political or senior diplomatic positions, which they received after donations were made – such as UK Ambassador and Assistant Attorney General.

As ZeroHedge reports:
Here is the first cut of the alleged major donors on the leaked documents and the positions they received (via Magafeed.com)
#1 Matthew Berzun … Ambassador to UK
#2 Julius Genachowski … Former chairman to FCC
#3 Frank Sanchez…. Under secretary of commerce
#8 Kirk Wagner… Ambassador to Singapore
#9 Alan Solomont … Ambassador to Spain
#11 John Roos… Ambassador to Japan
#12 Nicole Avant… Ambassador to Bahamas
#13 Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe … Ambassador to the UN
#16 Steve Westly – CFO of California
#17 Don Beyer – Ambassador to Switzerland
#21 Don Gips – Ambassador to South Africa
#22 Howard Gutman – Ambassador to Belgium
#24 Cynthia Stroum – Ambassador to Luxembourg
#27 Mark Gilbert – Ambassador to New Zealand
#31 Norm Eisen – Ambassador to Czech Republic
#37 Bruce Oreck – Ambassador to Finland
#43 Tony West – deputy Attorney General
#45 Bill Kennard – Ambassador to EU
The DNC responded to the latest hack claim Tuesday through its Interim Chair Donna Brazile, who stated that the “DNC is the victim of a crime,” which she blamed on “Russian state-sponsored agents,” while also cautioning that the hacked documents were still being authenticated by the DNC legal team, as “it is common for Russian hackers to forge documents.” DNC pre-emptively published a statement in an attempt to change the narrative…
1

The leak also includes details about Hillary Clinton’s VP running mate Tim Kaine:
The hacker persona Guccifer 2.0 has released a new trove of documents that allegedly reveal more information about the Democratic National Committee’s finances and personal information on Democratic donors, as well as details about the DNC’s network infrastructure.
The cache also includes purported memos on tech initiatives from Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine’s time as governor of Virginia, and some years-old missives on redistricting efforts and DNC donor outreach strategy.
Seriously, why can’t Democrats and Hillary Clinton’s campaign handle their IT equipment? These hacks seem to come out weekly, and each one is worse than the last.

These hacks expose major corruption at the highest levels of government, and should spell doom for Hillary Clinton’s presidential ambitions.


God bless,
JohnnyD



Friday, September 9, 2016

Why Obama could never allow Hillary to be indicted

From: World Net Daily

by - Joseph Farah


As the facts about Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state become clearer every day, the question every American should ask themselves is whether she got away with a very significant and heinous crime for the following reasons:
  • She was a Democrat and was widely seen by the Democratic Party as the likely successor to Barack Obama.
  • She was part of the Democratic Party and Washington establishment, and they seldom turn on their own. 
  • Those who would be responsible for prosecuting her in the U.S. Justice Department were loyal to Bill and Hillary Clinton because Loretta Lynch, the attorney general, got her previous job as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York in 1999 when she was nominated by then-President Clinton. 
  • Lynch moved from that position as U.S. attorney in New York to a partnership with Hogan & Hartson, a giant international law firm whose clients included the Clintons and the Saudi royal family, which donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. 
  • In 2004, Hogan & Hartson in Virginia filed a patent trademark request for Denver-based MX Logic Inc., the computer software firm that developed the email encryption system used to manage Hillary Clinton’s private email server beginning in July 2013. A tech expert has observed that employees of MX Logic could have had access to all the emails that went through her account. 
  • While there is no evidence Lynch played a direct role either in the tax work done by the firm for the Clintons or in linking Hillary’s private email server to MX Logic, the ethics of the legal profession hold all partners jointly liable for the actions of other partners in a business. 
  • In an April 26, 2010, statement, Hogan & Hartson announced that Lynch had decided to return to her previous Justice Department job after being nominated by President Obama in February 2010 to become once again the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York. 
  • A report published April 8, 2008, by the American Lawyer noted Hogan & Hartson were among Hillary Clinton’s biggest financial supporters in the legal industry during her first presidential campaign. In addition, Hogan & Hartson was a major donor to the Clinton Foundation. Further, Christine Varney, another partner at the firm, served as chief counsel to the Clinton-Gore Campaign in 1992. 
  • As first reported by Patrick Howley on Breitbart.com last August, Hogan & Hartson filed with the Commissioner for Trademarks in Virginia to abandon MX Logic’s application for the trademark SPAMTRAQ in a letter written on Hogan & Hartson stationary and signed by the firm’s Virginia-based attorney Audrey H. Reed on May 19, 2004. 
  • On July 30, 2009, Internet security software giant McAfee Inc. announced it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire MX Logic for $140 million in cash. In November 2012, without explanation, Clinton’s private email account was reconfigured to use Google’s servers as a backup in case her own personal email server failed. Then, in July 2013, five months after Clinton resigned as secretary of state, her private email server was reconfigured again to use a Denver-based commercial email provider, MX Logic, which was then owned by McAfee. 
  • In June 2013, Clinton hired Platte River networks in Denver to upgrade, secure and manage the private email server for both Clintons and their staffs. Marc Perkel, a tech entrepreneur and former systems administrator at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, went on the record on March 16, 2015, explaining that employees at MX Logic, now owned by McAfee, “had full access” to all of Hillary Clinton’s classified emails in an unencrypted form. 
  • Then, of course, there’s that innocent little, chance meeting between Bill Clinton and Lynch at the Sky Harbor Airport in Phoenix when both their planes happened to be there at the same time. A few days later, when the heat was at its hottest, FBI Director James Comey announce his agency was closing the investigation of Hillary’s breaches of national security because there was “no intent” on her part to commit a high crime.
With all of this background, most of it virtually unreported by the in-the-tank-for-Hillary Big Media, I defy any American who cares about equal justice under the law to read the following federal law – 18 U.S. Code § 2071:
(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
Do you know any prominent person clearly and self-evidently guilty of this provision?
Of course you do.

Are you going to vote for that person for president when she should be in prison – along with many members of the current administration who helped cover up her crime?

That’s the question you need to ask yourself, along with these:
  • Do you believe in equal justice under the law? 
  • Should the gilded elite get away with crimes for which other ordinary citizens, including some members of the military, are currently serving prison terms – even though they had “no intent” either? 
  • Do you really believe Hillary Clinton has change her ways as a result of this experience – even while she continues to lie that she did nothing wrong? 
  • How do you think she’ll handle classified and top-secret information as president?
 
God bless,
JohnnyD

Thursday, September 8, 2016

Comey Tries To Justify Giving Hillary Clinton Get Out of Jail Free Card

From: Conservative HQ

by - CHQ Staff | 9/8/2016 


You know things are bad at the FBI when Director James Comey releases a memo to all employees justifying his decision not to file charges against Hillary Clinton, but that’s exactly what happened yesterday. 

In the memo Comey said the decision to not recommend charges against the now-Democratic nominee wasn’t a close call. “At the end of the day, the case itself was not a cliff-hanger; despite all the chest-beating by people no longer in government, there really wasn’t a prosecutable case,” he claimed in the memo. 

Comey claimed at the beginning of the memo that he was writing, “Because it is generating a lot of interest, I thought I should update you on where we are with our commitment to transparency in the wake of the Clinton email investigation.” 

The FBI has been criticized for releasing the Clinton emails on the Friday before Labor Day, so Comey explained that he wrestled with the idea of waiting until after Labor Day Weekend to release the documents, but in the spirit of transparency, he released them as soon as they were ready. 

“I almost ordered the material held until Tuesday because I knew we would take all kinds of grief for releasing it before a holiday weekend, but my judgment was that we had promised transparency and it would be game-playing to withhold it from the public just to avoid folks saying stuff about us,” Comey told the FBI staff. 

“We don’t play games. So we released it Friday. We are continuing to process more material and will release batches of documents as they are ready, no matter the day of the week,” Comey wrote. 

He ended his memo by reiterating that this decision was not politically motivated. 

We are not sure to whom Director Comey was specifically referring to when he wrote, “…despite all the chest-beating by people no longer in government, there really wasn’t a prosecutable case,” but Fox News contributor Judge Andrew Napolitano laid out the “prosecutable case” quite clearly in an op-ed in yesterday’s Washington Times

As Judge Napolitano observed, by examining the contents of an email to see whether it contained state secrets, which it clearly did not, Mrs. Clinton demonstrated an awareness of the law — namely, that it is the contents of a document or email that cause it to be protected by federal secrecy statutes, not the denomination put on it by the sender. 

This added to the case against her because she later told the FBI that she had never paid attention to whether a document contained state secrets or not. In the strange world of espionage prosecution, this denial of intent is an admission of guilt, as it is profoundly the job of the secretary of State to recognize state secrets and to keep them in their secure government-protected venues, and the grossly negligent failure to do so is criminal, noted Napolitano. 

The FBI notes of the interrogation recount that Mrs. Clinton professed serious memory lapses 39 times, said Judge Napolitano. She also professed ignorance over what “C” means in the margin of a government document. “C” in the margin means “confidential,” which is one of the three levels of federal state secrets. The other two levels are “secret” and “top secret.”  

Under federal law, Mrs. Clinton was required to keep in secure government venues all documents in those three categories. The FBI, said Napolitano, found that she had failed to do so hundreds of times. 

But here is Judge Napolitano’s most damning observation about the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton and Director Comey’s decision not to prosecute her:

The records released last week also reveal that the FBI must have been restrained from the outset from conducting an aggressive investigation. It did not present any evidence to a grand jury. It did not ask a grand jury for any subpoenas, and hence it didn’t serve any. It did not ask a judge for any search warrants, and hence it didn’t serve any. The data and hardware it gathered in the case were given to it in response to simple requests it made. 

I counted five times in the report where the FBI lamented that it did not have what it needed. This is the FBI’s own fault. This tepid FBI behavior is novel in modern federal law enforcement. It is inimical to public safety and the rule of law. It is close to misconduct in office by high-ranking FBI officials. 

Someone restrained the FBI. 

The FBI did not ask Mrs. Clinton aggressive follow-up questions. Her interrogators just blithely accepted her answers. They failed to present her with documents she had signed that would have contradicted what she was telling them — particularly, an oath she signed on her first day in office promising to recognize state secrets when she came upon them and to keep them in secure venues. And agents violated Department of Justice policy by not recording her interrogation when her lawyers told them she would not answer questions if her answers were recorded. 

Now the FBI has interjected itself into the presidential campaign by releasing these documents. Hillary and the FBI Notwithstanding the mountain of evidence pointing to Mrs. Clinton’s guilt, it is highly improper and grossly unfair to release evidence gathered against a person who will not be prosecuted. Moreover, it is tendentious to release only part of the evidence — only what agents want the public to see — rather than the complete file. Yet all this evidence is secret under Department of Justice regulations. Had any of it been intended for or presented to a grand jury, the release of it would have been criminal. 

What happened here? The FBI seriously dropped the ball, and Mrs. Clinton was more concerned about being indicted than she was about losing the race for the presidency. 

It is apparent that some in FBI management blindly followed what they were told to do — exonerate Hillary Clinton. There is no other explanation for the FBI’s failure from the outset to use ordinary law enforcement tools available to it. Yet some in the FBI are not professionally satisfied by this outcome. They know that a strong case for prosecution and for guilt is being ignored for political reasons. 

No wonder Director Comey was forced to issue a memo to the entire staff of the FBI and that reports of plummeting agency morale are all over the media.


God bless,
JohnnyD

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

New Evidence Damns Hillary Clinton’s Web of Lies

From: American Liberty Report


In a new development in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, the FBI revealed that Clinton used software specially designed to make recovery of data impossible in deleting messages from her private server.

Republican Representative Trey Gowdy of South Carolina told Fox News that the software is called BleachBit, and it’s designed to securely erase data so the information can’t be recovered by forensic techniques used to restore old computer files.

In 2015, when Clinton was questioned about “wiping” her email server, she tried to make a joke about it, asking, “like with a cloth or something?” It now turns out that BleachBit was the “cloth” she was referring to.

According to BleachBit’s maker, “Beyond simply deleting files, BleachBit includes advanced features such as shredding files to prevent recovery, wiping free disk space to hide traces of files deleted by other applications, and vacuuming Firefox to make it faster.”

Some pundits have compared the missing email messages to the missing 18 minutes of audio deleted from tapes in former President Richard Nixon’s office during the Watergate scandal. Ironically, it was Hillary Clinton who helped arrange for impeachment proceedings against Nixon.

Representative Gowdy claimed that the use of BleachBit showed Clinton’s intention to hide evidence.

In fact, it was following the March 2, 2015 story in The New York Times entitled “Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules” that Clinton’s consultants at the Platte River Network in Denver used BleachBit to delete the emails from her server permanently.

Specifically, the FBI claims in its reports that Platte River deleted these emails between March 25 and March 31 following an “Oh S*** moment” by one of its staff members whose name has been redacted.

Platte River was subpoenaed by Congressional committees looking into the email matter. The committees wrote to Platte River CEO Treve Suazo, claiming that there were three instances when the company refused to provide documents or to allow its employees to be interviewed. For its part, Platte River’s attorney refused to comment on the matter, citing attorney-client privilege.

“If she considered [her emails] to be personal, then [Clinton] and her lawyers had those emails deleted. They didn’t just push the delete button, they had them deleted where even God can’t read them,” declared Gowdy.

“They were using something called BleachBit. You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails… When you’re using BleachBit, it is for something you really do not want the world to see.”

Under normal circumstances, when email messages or computer files are deleted, the data of those messages and files remains stored on the disk where they’re located, but the directory information pointing to their locations is altered. As long as there’s empty space left on the disk, that space will be used first for storage before the original files or messages are overwritten.

But BleachBit and software tools like it irreversibly overwrite both the actual data and the directory information, making recovery unfeasible.

BleachBit is “open-source” software, meaning that it cannot be audited for “backdoors,” unlike “closed-source” software, which is what the government generally uses for its information technology projects, especially in the wake of the leaks published by Edward Snowden in 2013.

In an interview on CNN, operating systems analyst Jonathan Zdziarski said that typically “someone trying to cover their tracks would likely pay for and use a much more expensive, specialized [closed-source] data destruction tool.”

The problem with closed-source software, however, is that its makers can be audited for records of users’ actions. Open-source software is freely available in the marketplace, and updates to the software come from end users, rather than from the software’s original authors. As such, the updates are not guaranteed, and the distributors of such software are usually not bound to the same terms of warranty and liability as commercial software makers.

In an article by computer security expert Bruce Schneider, Schneider states, “Closed-source software is easier for the NSA to backdoor than open-source software.” In the same article, Schneider went on to say he recommends using BleachBit to securely erase files.

Following the FBI’s revelation about BleachBit, traffic to the software’s site spiked as people sought out the same secure tool that Clinton used to safely delete their own files and messages. The Congressional committee that subpoenaed Platte River is considering recommending changes in the law regarding email storage for federal employees.

With this latest revelation, it’s clear that Clinton intended not to have any records available that could be examined or reverse-engineered to make reading her emails possible; for Clinton to continue to claim that deletion of her messages was innocent is patently absurd.


God bless,
JohnnyD

Media Invented Lie About Trump Mocking Disabled Reporter

From: Human Events

by - Ann Coulter - August 31, 2016


Just when you think the media could not possibly become more loathsome, the Fourth Estate bullies prove you wrong again. The Washington Post’s latest ugliness was to exploit the disability of a newspaper reporter in order to smear the Republican nominee for president. Then — and this is the least surprising part of the story — the Post lied about it.

Other than the subject of that paragraph — which I slyly switched from Trump to the media — that is an exact paraphrase of the Post’s opening lines from an editorial hawking the media’s most successful lie about Donald Trump: that he mocked a man for being disabled.

I have a chapter on that lie in my new book, In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome!, It was perfectly obvious that Trump was not mimicking any disability that Serge has, but I didn’t have the smoking gun to prove that the media were lying and knew they were lying. Now we have it.

A group called Catholics 4 Trump has posted a video clip of another part of that same speech, in which Trump imitates a flustered general. Guess what? He does the exact same arm flailing.

In another speech, Trump pretended to be a timorous Ted Cruz. Again, he does the exact same arm flailing. You can see the videos here: www.catholics4trump.com/the-true-story-donald-trum…

Neither the general nor Cruz is disabled.

If a jury ever saw these videos, it would acquit Trump immediately. Trump’s impression of a groveling reporter is just like his imitation of a groveling general and just like his imitation of a groveling U.S. senator. He’s like Rich Little that way: All his impressions look the same.

Perhaps Trump is not a subtle actor, but he’s utterly innocent of making fun of a disabled person.

Now consider the media’s role in manufacturing, and then protecting, this lie. Reporters were at Trump’s speech. They were filming it. They saw him do the identical imitation of a general during that same speech.

The media knew damn well that Trump does the arm-waving routine whenever he’s pretending to be a flustered person. But they never allowed the public to see the clip of Trump doing the same imitation of a general.

hat is proof that the media knew they were lying.

And isn’t it curious that in the midst of the frenzy over Trump’s allegedly mocking a disabled reporter, you’ve never seen the reporter interviewed? Why don’t they show us Serge, so that the public can gasp in horror and say, Why Trump’s imitation is the spitting image of Serge Kovaleski!

The reason the media won’t show an interview with Serge is that if you ever saw him speaking, it would be blindingly obvious that Trump’s imitation isn’t in the same universe as Serge’s affliction. Serge speaks perfectly calmly. He does not twitch, jerk or flail his arms. (That’s Debbie Wasserman Schultz you’re thinking of.)

There’s an old interview with Serge here: 

www.catholics4trump.com/wapo-fact-checker-gets-4-hillarys-for-ignoring-evidence-trump-didnt-mock-reporters-disability.

The absence of a current Serge interview is the dog that didn’t bark. The only reason you will never see anything but a still photo of Serge is so that the media can trick the public into believing he has something like cerebral palsy.

In fact, his disability is almost the exact opposite of what Trump was doing: Serge has arthrogryposis, which locks his wrists in place, actually preventing movement.

We also have proof that the media know they are lying about Trump mocking a disabled man. In the “Comments” section to a Washington Post article pushing this lie, someone posted a perfectly respectful response that included the Catholics 4 Trump videos — of Trump doing the exact same imitation of a general and of Serge being interviewed. The Post deleted the comment — and pronto!

Why did the Post instantly remove those videos from the “Comments” section? To hide the evidence of its lying.

That’s consciousness of guilt. The Post couldn’t allow anyone to see those videos because then everyone would see that this is how Trump imitates any frightened person. Maybe he won’t be hired by “Saturday Night Live” as a sketch comedian — and as you know, that show will hire almost anybody these days — but Trump did not “mock” a disabled man.

None of the media’s other hysterical anti-Trump campaigns are getting any traction. Trump said a Hispanic judge was biased against him? It’s hard for people to be outraged when our entire justice system is premised on the idea that all-white juries can’t be trusted to deliver fair verdicts to black defendants.

Trump criticized a Gold Star Dad? Yes, but that Gold Star Dad also happened to be a snarling Muslim who took the stage at the Democratic National Convention in order to viciously lecture Trump, saying he has no right to venture opinions because his kid didn’t die in Iraq. Khizr Khan isn’t exactly a baby seal.

Trump called Hillary the “MVP” of ISIS? Most people didn’t need the media’s earnest “fact-checks” establishing beyond dispute that ISIS has not, in fact, given Hillary the MVP award. Nor “Most Improved.” Nor “Best Spirit.”

Of all things Trump has been accused of, the claim that he made fun of a disabled person is the only one that has hurt him — and justly so, if it were true. But now we know it was a big, fat, intentional lie by our guardians of truth and justice in the media.


God bless,
JohnnyD

Saturday, September 3, 2016

2021: The United Shariah States of America

Exclusive: Andrew Thorp King looks ahead to when caliphate is 'world's lone superpower'


Interesting Read


by -  Andrew Thorp King - 9-2-16


The Jordanian journalist Fouad Hussein warned us. Spelled it all out, albeit it in Arabic, for us all to read. Told us all that this was the plan. Back in 2005 he penned the warning shot in his book “Al-Zarqawi: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda.”

What exactly did he warn about?

That damn 20-year plan.

The evil, ambitious, prescient plan that led us to where we are now, here in 2021, where ISIS has Islamized America.

Where Christians, Jews, homosexuals, atheists, and moderate Muslims have been choked out of their right to conscience.

Where the sight of a beautiful woman’s hair is a faded, distant memory now covered by a hijab in perpetuity.

Where the surviving remnant of yesterday’s Western elite now cower in submissive fear to their newfound Islamic power brokers.

Where rock ‘n’ roll, as AC/DC once deeply protested was patently untrue, has now been outlawed and legally deemed noise pollution.

The 20-year plan has unfolded with terrifying precision in accordance with its blueprint.

Phase 1 (2000-2003): Poke, irritate and provoke the West. USS Cole. 9/11. DONE.

Phase 2 (2003-2006): Normalize apocalyptic Islamism throughout the Muslim world. Establish Iraq as a centerpiece of operations for jihad. Create an army there. Establish contingent bases firmly placed in other Arabic states. DONE.

Phase 3 (2007-2010): Expand the fight and target those with secular governments averse to Islamism. Hyper-focus on Syria. But also Jordan, Turkey and, of course, Israel, the little Satan. DONE.

Phase 4 (2010-2013): Dismantle the infidel regimes of the Middle East through popular revolts and revolution. Stoke the flames of insurgencies. The Arab Spring. Egypt, Bahrain, Syria, Libya, Yemen. Continue cyber-attacks on the U.S. Intensify the cyber propaganda campaigns.DONE.

Phase 5 (2013-2016): Formally declare an established caliphate. The one that the Western media mocked any commentator for warning about. Exploit the weak Western will and re-create the first caliphate in nine decades. This is the first step in creating the Islamic New World Order in which a clear divide exists between a united Muslim community of believers (dar al-Islam) and the unbelievers (dar al-harb), or house of war. ISIS, ISIL, IS. Whatever the iteration, it has now been placed firmly on the to-done list. DONE.

Phase 6 (2016-2019): Move toward total confrontation. Use the caliphate as a catalyst for a focused instigation of the West. Through continued attacks, force the West to muster their last long-drawn effort to attempt to confront the inevitable growth of the caliphate. Orlando. Paris. Brussels. Nice. DONE.

Phase 7 (2020): Push through into definitive victory. The caliphate crosses the line into victory over the West. The West’s effort to use supreme technology to defeat the caliphate is impotent as the nimbleness of jihad proved to be more of an asset than the West’s supreme technological power. The caliphate attracts more followers exponentially, leaving it as the world’s lone remaining superpower with the strength of 1.5 billion Muslims. Borderless and asymmetrical as hell. DONE.

Today is Thursday. The last one in September. The autumn leaves are as beautiful as they ever were this time of year, except for the light, consistent layer of soft ash that floats down on them periodically throughout the day. The ash that comes from the incinerator just down the street. Thursdays are their biggest production day. Wednesdays are drop-off days for that week’s collection activity, so Thursday is when most of the burning happens. Hence, more ash. I escaped the incinerator by pledging my life to Islam. A coward I am. Those who are brave, the collected ones – all the infidels – Christians, homosexuals, atheists and especially the Jews, they get the fire. Some days I wish I chose to be with them.

Instead, I sit and wonder what would have happened if we got wise to their 20-year plan back in 2016. Back when it was already clear they were right on track with the first five phases. Or if we paid more attention to the implications of the poll taken of Muslims living in the U.S. back in 2015 that showed that 51 percent embraced Shariah over the U.S. Constitution. Could we have hedged the remaining two phases if we knew better? I doubt it. But only God knows.

God knows the West did very little to push back the creeping of this now dominant, ubiquitous Shariah. The civilization jihadists pushed for their own sub-legal system in Texas, just like in Londonistan. And we eventually gave in. No political will. Only political correctness.

We essentially rolled over as the Muslim Brotherhood methodically infiltrated our power structures and government entities for years with an underlying intent to wage civilization jihad on us in a slow, deliberate, calculated fashion. The Western frog lying cluelessly in the hot boiling water of increasing Islamism.

So, here I sit, a slave in the United Shariah States of America. I’ve lost all integrity by submitting to the faith of my captors, and yet still I am their slave. I’ve escaped death but still lost life by turning my soul away from my own faith and devotion to my country.

I never saw this coming. The West never saw this coming. The stinging memory of Nazism did nothing to help us perceive this new, similar threat. A threat directly connected to and inspired by the ideology and strategies of Nazism. But it was all right there. All in the plan.

Andrew Thorp King’s book “BLAZE: Operation Persian Trinity” is a geo-political spy thriller that exposes the dangers of Islamic eschatology and the belief in the Twelfth Imam. Out now on World Ahead Press.


God bless,
JohnnyD


Highly decorated vet: Never-Trump pols have no honor

Exclusive: Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady flays Republicans who broke endorsement pledge





Recently, in discussions on the upcoming election, a friend denounced the lack of civility by the candidates, obviously referring to the rhetoric of Donald Trump.

My response was that it was not civility that was the problem with our politicians, it was honor.

In my experience with politicians, although many actually hate each other, they are civil, albeit a phony civility. How many times do we hear “my esteemed colleague” in reference to a colleague a politician despises?

Certainly, civility is necessary in debate, but honor is the imperative. Duty, honor, country is the basis of military service and should be of politics. Too many politicians have never and would never serve, and they spend more time raising money than doing their duty; they have no honor, and they would ignore the character of our country for a vote.

My favorite example of honor among politicians of our past is the duel between Andrew Jackson and Charles Dickinson, a man who insulted Jackson’s wife. Never mind that Dickinson was the best shot in the state and had killed 26 men in previous duels, Jackson could not abide the insult to his wife’s honor and challenged him to a duel. Jackson knew he was outgunned and had little hope of survival, so he wore lose clothing and let Dickinson shoot first, hoping it would not be fatal and he would live long enough to kill Dickinson.

Dickinson did shoot first and put a bullet in Jackson that broke two of his ribs and lodged inches from his heart where it would remain the rest of his life. Jackson miraculously remained on his feet long enough to kill Dickinson. Reflecting on the duel, a doctor remarked to Jackson, “I don’t see how you stayed on your feet after that wound.” To which Jackson responded, “I would have stood up long enough to kill him if he had put a bullet in my brain.” Jackson was a man of honor whatever his other shortfalls may have been.

For Jackson, honor was more important than his life. For many politicians today, a vote is more important than their honor. I understand the revulsion toward dueling today, but I admire the honor behind them. Can it be imagined that Jackson, or any politician of his era, would stand by and be called a liar to his face?

Look at the pols in this election cycle who pledged, on their honor, to support their party’s nominee for president – and broke their pledge. They lied to our face. Many of these people, considered giants among politicians today, are disgracing themselves: Ted Cruz (who was my choice), John Kasich, Jeb Bush and the other Bushes and Republicans who boycotted the Republican convention. John McCain, on the other hand, a military man, endorsed Trump despite the damage it could have done to his re-election. McCain is a man of honor.

Unbelievably, many of these turncoats were motivated because they personally disliked Donald Trump, because he, and the people of their own party, soundly humiliated them in the primaries. They must know that a Hillary Clinton presidency will destroy the courts and the character of the country they claim to love. They broke their pledge even though Trump represents the very ideals they claim to espouse. These people are petty, self-absorbed and without honor.

Akin to a lack of honor is the fact that many Republicans are not team players. I think of Mitch McConnell and Lisa Murkowski. McConnell cast the deciding vote for an amendment that denied the people the right to protect their flag, a right Americans had enjoyed since our birth as a nation, a right taken away by the Supreme Court as a result of a flag-burning by a communist. He voted against his own party despite the fact that 75 percent of the people, almost two-thirds of the Congress and every state legislature in the country did not believe flag-burning was speech.

And neither did James Madison, the author of the Bill of Rights, and his friend Thomas Jefferson. Of course McConnell’s vote made him a hero with the media and leftists who believe only they, not the people, should interpret our Constitution. As one would expect from such a man, he has openly criticized Trump and praised Clinton.

Lisa Murkowski, a favorite daughter (appointed to office by her father, former Sen. Frank Murkowski) from Alaska, ignored her defeat by the primary voters from her party and ran and won as a write-in. As a senator she has “evolved” on same-sex marriage contrary to the position she ran on. She does not know if she will vote for Trump and also supports what I call a quad-sexual (LGBT) military, which is an assault on the ethos of our armed forces.

St. Thomas Aquinas, a staunch conservative, defined the commandment, “Thou Shalt Not Steal.” One of the characteristics of a thief, he said, was their buying promotions to positions of power and using their constituents’ money for their own self-aggrandizement to the detriment of or contrary to the understanding of those who gave them the money. Murkowski and many of our politicians today meet St. Thomas’s definition of a thief. And as the saying goes, there is no honor among thieves.

Murkowski and McConnell are poster children for others in Trump’s party who have also revealed their real selves in this election, who are not team players, who “evolve” (principles don’t evolve), who have no honor and who steal from their constituents.

In the military, we have a simple test for honor: Would I want this person with me in combat? We don’t want evolvers, non-team players, liars, thieves or people without honor – and neither should voters. Gen. George Patton, who understood duty, honor, country, said: “Politicians are the lowest form of life on earth.” Certainly, a lack of honor is a characteristic of low forms of human life.

We can only pray that the electorate recognizes and abhors their lack of this virtue, essential to our character as a people. Whatever the outcome of this election, we should be grateful to Trump for his assault on political correctness, which makes cowards of so many of his opponents, and for exposing their lack of honor. We can only pray that these people do not represent who the rest of us are as a people.

We are in the swirl around the drain, and politicians without honor will flush us down.
 
 
God bless,
JohnnyD