Now that #WhatsHerName has been relegated to the dustbin of political history,
the list on the right is just a stunning lesson in hubris...
God bless,
JohnnyD
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Black vet's epic takedown of anti-Trump rioters
A black Air Force veteran is fed up at anti-Trump rioters who disrespect America’s flag, refuse to say the Pledge of Allegiance, reject their duly-elected president and wreak havoc in U.S. cities, smashing windows, blocking freeways and igniting fires.
In fact, Thaddeus Dionne Alexander is so outraged by the rioters that he posted a video on YouTube and Facebook – and his message is going viral with 20 million views and nearly a million shares on Facebook alone.
“Wow, y’all are protesting? Really? Man, I don’t understand. It’s not Republicans causing all this destruction, you know, burning up the streets, blocking roads and things like that. It’s the liberals,” Alexander begins.
“You know, these are the same people that are against the Second Amendment. Because they want to ‘decrease violence,’ nobody should have guns. The same people that are [pro]-abortion because they want to ‘save lives.’ And you’re causing all this destruction just because your candidate lost.”
But Alexander explains, in America, “You can’t always get your way.”
He continued:
Everybody wants to be politically correct. Quit being crybabies!
Ain’t nothing free! You ain’t no slave!
You don’t get your way, so you act like a 2-year-old, burning up people’s stuff?
Destroying the streets, making people late for work?
Man, I’m glad I don’t live in New York City or Washington or Oregon because I would run one of your asses over. You are outrageous, man. You are the exact reason why Donald Trump won the election. Because we’re tired of you crybabies.
You didn’t earn anything. None of you put on a uniform. But you’re quick to disrespect the flag. Not want to say the Pledge of Allegiance. Not want to recognize the Bible. But you want everything.
You didn’t fight for anything. But you want it.
It doesn’t work like that. …
All these people out there that want to protest and burn stuff up, I don’t think the cops should protect them. When people look at the flag and say, ‘That’s not my flag. Donald Trump is not my president,’ then you know what? Obviously this ain’t your damn country! Leave!
Find another flag. Find another president. Go to Mexico. I really don’t care.
But quit tearing up stuff.
Quit causing destruction and preaching peace. Because you’re contradicting yourself.During a Monday appearance on “Fox & Friends,” Alexander explained that he was astonished at how the left depicted Republicans as angry individuals who hoarded guns and wanted to “kill babies.”
In fact, Clinton-supporting media outlets predicted Republicans would refuse to accept undesirable election results. On Oct. 27, the New York Times warned of violence by Trump supporters and “another Revolutionary War” should Hillary Clinton win the White House.
And after Trump’s Election Day victory, CNN reported Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Mike Evans refused to stand for the national anthem. “I’m not going to stand for something I don’t believe in,” Evans said, adding that “America’s not right” for electing Trump.
But for all the media warnings, it turns out, anti-Trump rioters are the ones inflicting violence, destruction and mayhem in American cities.
“I just thought it was so hypocritical. It just amazed me how people reacted,” Alexander said.
“We need to preserve this country. We need to stop burning flags. We need to stand for the pledge of allegiance. And we need to be proud of what we have here.”
Alexander concluded, “Being a black man, there is no other country where we’re accepted like we are in the U.S.
“People may think so. I’ve had friend say, ‘We’ll go back to Africa.’ Well, everybody knows if you’re black man, you’re not accepted in Africa. You’re not African. It’s just not going to work like that. This is the only place where you can be openly gay or homosexual. There’s nowhere else to go.”
Since his video went viral, Alexander’s Facebook page has been flooded with comments, mostly in support of his statements. Some include:
- I vote Dionne for the 2020 election!
- Thank you for putting yourself out there!
- I think you’re amazing, and you’ve taught me not to be afraid of what people think of me! Thank you for that, and thank you for your service to our great nation!
- I’m with you. Stand your ground. I refuse to be bullied and don’t care what they say. I take no stock in what they say, I know what’s in my heart. The biggest racist are the ones labeling all of us racist.
- No, you’re not the only one that thinks this way. There are $50+ million of us. Thank you for your service to this country and speaking up on this important issue.
- You deserve so much recognition. It’s Americans like you that make this country great. Thank you.
- My family and I sincerely thank you for your service. Its comforting to see people of ALL race, color and creed beginning to unite and come together for a better America!
God bless,
JohnnyD
Paid Protests Outed By Fox News, Liberals FURIOUS
From: Patriot Update
by -
First, we have to examine the nature of the American liberal.
Normally reserved crybabies, these “outraged” leftists have been taking
to the streets for several nights in a row, marching to violent chants
and lighting American flags on fire.
Remember, these are the same whiners who need “safe spaces” because the very word “Trump” written in chalk on their college campuses “triggers” them and causes these precious snowflakes to break down and run for counseling.
So why, now, are they suddenly emboldened by the fair and democratic election of Donald Trump? Did they just put aside their fragility and glass emotions to run amok, or is there something more going on? Could it be that these protesters are not at all what they seem?
Throughout the campaigns of the bizarre and emotional 2016 presidential election, the left have staged several undercover attacks on Donald Trump. Many of these came in the form of a violent uprising by “concerned liberals” during Trump’s campaign events. The goal was to create a sense of chaos surrounding the republican candidate, fomenting an association between Trump and anarchy that Americans would have branded in their psyche as they headed into the voting booth.
The only problem with their plan, which included paid agent provocateurs on George Soros’ payroll, is that the scheme was completely transparent. The entire debacle was sniffed out by the new, true media on the right within hours of the first action by the bough-and-paid-for protesters.
It was easy to spot. The actions themselves were not indicative of a plan concocted by politically aware, concerned citizens. These were outright thugs with no deeper, moral argument for their actions. When interviewed on television, many were forced to simply spout the chants that they had been instructed to use during their hiring process.
Then came the advertisements, hiding in plain sight. Many patriotic citizens reported finding classified ads on websites such as Craigslist in which cash money was being offered for anyone willing to protest against the then republican nominee. The ads were hiding in plain sight all along.
Now, even Fox News is willing to call them out:
By calling into question the randomness of these new protests, Fox News has entirely neutered the entire “movement”. No longer can anyone take these actions seriously, given how simple it is to trace them back to wealthy liberal activists who are simply hiring broke millennials to do their dirty work for them.
Of course, this has infuriated the left, who cannot stand it when facts get in the way of their misguided and childish emotional tantrums. Now that these protests have been nullified by solid, investigative research, perhaps the country can move forward and work together.
God bless,
JohnnyD
by -
There has been no shortage of evidence that these violent,
anti-American protests over the election of Donald Trump are nothing
more than business as usual for the left.
Remember, these are the same whiners who need “safe spaces” because the very word “Trump” written in chalk on their college campuses “triggers” them and causes these precious snowflakes to break down and run for counseling.
So why, now, are they suddenly emboldened by the fair and democratic election of Donald Trump? Did they just put aside their fragility and glass emotions to run amok, or is there something more going on? Could it be that these protesters are not at all what they seem?
Throughout the campaigns of the bizarre and emotional 2016 presidential election, the left have staged several undercover attacks on Donald Trump. Many of these came in the form of a violent uprising by “concerned liberals” during Trump’s campaign events. The goal was to create a sense of chaos surrounding the republican candidate, fomenting an association between Trump and anarchy that Americans would have branded in their psyche as they headed into the voting booth.
The only problem with their plan, which included paid agent provocateurs on George Soros’ payroll, is that the scheme was completely transparent. The entire debacle was sniffed out by the new, true media on the right within hours of the first action by the bough-and-paid-for protesters.
It was easy to spot. The actions themselves were not indicative of a plan concocted by politically aware, concerned citizens. These were outright thugs with no deeper, moral argument for their actions. When interviewed on television, many were forced to simply spout the chants that they had been instructed to use during their hiring process.
Then came the advertisements, hiding in plain sight. Many patriotic citizens reported finding classified ads on websites such as Craigslist in which cash money was being offered for anyone willing to protest against the then republican nominee. The ads were hiding in plain sight all along.
Now, even Fox News is willing to call them out:
By calling into question the randomness of these new protests, Fox News has entirely neutered the entire “movement”. No longer can anyone take these actions seriously, given how simple it is to trace them back to wealthy liberal activists who are simply hiring broke millennials to do their dirty work for them.
Of course, this has infuriated the left, who cannot stand it when facts get in the way of their misguided and childish emotional tantrums. Now that these protests have been nullified by solid, investigative research, perhaps the country can move forward and work together.
God bless,
JohnnyD
Report: Three Million Votes in Presidential Election Cast by Illegal Aliens
Trump may have won popular vote
From: InfoWars
by - November 14, 2016
Three million votes in the U.S. presidential election were cast by illegal aliens, according to Greg Phillips of the VoteFraud.org organization.
If true, this would mean that Donald Trump still won the contest despite widespread vote fraud and almost certainly won the popular vote.
“We have verified more than three million votes cast by non-citizens,” tweeted Phillips after reporting that the group had completed an analysis of a database of 180 million voter registrations.
“Number of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million. Consulting legal team,” he added.We have verified more than three million votes cast by non-citizens.We are joining .@TrueTheVote to initiate legal action. #unrigged
— Gregg Phillips (@JumpVote) November 13, 2016
Completed analysis of database of 180 million voter registrations.According to current indications, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by around 630,000 votes, although around 7 million ballots remain uncounted.
Number of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million.
Consulting legal team.
— Gregg Phillips (@JumpVote) November 11, 2016
Virtually all of the votes cast by 3 million illegal immigrants are likely to have been for Hillary Clinton, meaning Trump might have won the popular vote when this number is taken into account.
Vote fraud using ballots cast in the name of dead people and illegal alien voters was a huge concern before the election.
On the morning of the election there were 4 million dead people on U.S. voter rolls.
Although some states require some form of ID before voting, California, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C. all require no identification before voting.
God bless,
JohnnyD
Why the 2016 Election Proves America Needs the Electoral College
From: The Daily Signal
by - Jarrett Stepman /
by - Jarrett Stepman /
In the last week since Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in a
stunning electoral blowout, there have been calls from many on the left
to abolish America’s unique presidential election system.
It still hasn’t been settled whether Trump or Clinton won the popular vote, but many Democrats are upset about the possibility that their candidate may have won more total votes, yet lost the election.
Progressives are taking aim at the Electoral College and want to replace it with a national popular vote. This would both remove the indirect mediation of the electors’ votes, and more damagingly, eliminate the power of states in choosing a president.
You can read my pre-election explanation of how the Electoral College works and why the Founding Fathers created it here. The 2016 presidential election is a perfect illustration of why America needs to keep this institution in place, regardless of whether one supported the winner or the loser in 2016.
The War on the Electoral College
A number of prominent people have called for abolishing the Electoral College, including President Barack Obama’s former attorney general Eric Holder, and former Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis. And some of the media’s charges against the Electoral College have been hyperbolic.
One liberal professor called the Electoral College a “peculiar institution” and likened it to defending slavery, others simply labeled it racist, and one Slate writer denounced it as an “instrument of white supremacy—and sexism.”
Beyond the overheated rhetoric, detractors of the Electoral College have made two serious arguments.
First, that it’s simply unfair that a person can win the presidency without taking a majority of the national popular vote. Second, that an electoral emphasis on states as opposed to the people in an undifferentiated mass pushes candidates to only focus their attention on a few, closely contested “swing states.”
The ‘Fairness’ of the Electoral College
As designed in the Constitution, America’s presidential election is very much a product of the states—channeling the principle of “federalism” that the Founders cherished.
Smaller states receive a slightly higher number of votes compared to their population than more populous ones, which detractors of the Electoral College claim damages the idea of one man, one vote.
Many say this system is “unfair,” and that the total number of individual votes from all the states is a more accurate gauge for who the president should be. But, would it be fair for America’s chief executive to mostly be the product of a few urban centers in California, New York, and Texas?
The Electoral College system was designed to ensure that presidents would have to receive support from a diverse array of people around the country.
Modern candidates have to accommodate farmers in rural states, factory workers in industrial states, and software engineers in tech-dominated states. The president must consider the needs and opinions of people across the country instead of just the views of a few, highly populated urban centers.
The Electoral College ensures that the interests of “flyover country” in middle America cannot be ignored.
This was dramatically demonstrated in 2016. Trump drew the support of a huge number of states across the South and Midwest, while Clinton racked up massive majorities in the most populous states like New York and California.
Without an Electoral College, candidates would have little incentive to appeal to people outside the most urbanized, coastal states. Clinton was defeated because she couldn’t win over a majority of voters in the once Democrat-dominated Rust Belt that broke for Obama in the previous two elections.
The state results in the 2016 election also debunk the second major argument for abolishing the Electoral College: that candidates would only spend time campaigning in a few essential swing states.
Trump succeeded in defeating Clinton because he was able to pluck off a number of states—like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin—that had voted solidly Democrat for over a decade. This sudden shift is why Trump secured a surprise victory.
As author and Texas lawyer Tara Ross noted in a PragerU video, a state dominated by one party shifting to another is not a new phenomenon. California was a Republican stronghold until the late 1980s, and Texas used to be controlled entirely by Democrats.
Major electoral shifts have happened throughout American history, and will continue to do so as regions and political parties change. Demolishing the Electoral College should not be based on the outcome in a particular election.
Learn Why the Fence Was Built
The American system has had a remarkable success rate in transferring power from one presidential administration to the next.
This year, protestors unhappy with the election results have gathered in a few enclaves to denounce the president-elect. Some have even called for Democrat-dominated California to secede from the Union.
Yet, with the exception of 1860 (those secession threats were a little more serious than “#Calexit”), Americans have found a way to maintain an incredible record of political stability for over two centuries—in large part thanks to the Electoral College. It would be incredibly foolish to throw away that system for the sake of one side that didn’t get what it wanted this year.
The old adage that one should learn why a fence was built before tearing it down applies to our unique presidential election process. The rash call to dismantle the Electoral College that has been the model of stability over two centuries could do enormous damage to the United States.
Though the rules of the institution may seem strange, it is a carefully designed system conceived by the framers of the Constitution, and its opponents would do well to reflect on the reasons it was created before calling for its destruction.
God bless,
JohnnyD
It still hasn’t been settled whether Trump or Clinton won the popular vote, but many Democrats are upset about the possibility that their candidate may have won more total votes, yet lost the election.
Progressives are taking aim at the Electoral College and want to replace it with a national popular vote. This would both remove the indirect mediation of the electors’ votes, and more damagingly, eliminate the power of states in choosing a president.
You can read my pre-election explanation of how the Electoral College works and why the Founding Fathers created it here. The 2016 presidential election is a perfect illustration of why America needs to keep this institution in place, regardless of whether one supported the winner or the loser in 2016.
The War on the Electoral College
A number of prominent people have called for abolishing the Electoral College, including President Barack Obama’s former attorney general Eric Holder, and former Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis. And some of the media’s charges against the Electoral College have been hyperbolic.
One liberal professor called the Electoral College a “peculiar institution” and likened it to defending slavery, others simply labeled it racist, and one Slate writer denounced it as an “instrument of white supremacy—and sexism.”
Beyond the overheated rhetoric, detractors of the Electoral College have made two serious arguments.
First, that it’s simply unfair that a person can win the presidency without taking a majority of the national popular vote. Second, that an electoral emphasis on states as opposed to the people in an undifferentiated mass pushes candidates to only focus their attention on a few, closely contested “swing states.”
The ‘Fairness’ of the Electoral College
As designed in the Constitution, America’s presidential election is very much a product of the states—channeling the principle of “federalism” that the Founders cherished.
Smaller states receive a slightly higher number of votes compared to their population than more populous ones, which detractors of the Electoral College claim damages the idea of one man, one vote.
Many say this system is “unfair,” and that the total number of individual votes from all the states is a more accurate gauge for who the president should be. But, would it be fair for America’s chief executive to mostly be the product of a few urban centers in California, New York, and Texas?
The Electoral College system was designed to ensure that presidents would have to receive support from a diverse array of people around the country.
Modern candidates have to accommodate farmers in rural states, factory workers in industrial states, and software engineers in tech-dominated states. The president must consider the needs and opinions of people across the country instead of just the views of a few, highly populated urban centers.
The Electoral College ensures that the interests of “flyover country” in middle America cannot be ignored.
This was dramatically demonstrated in 2016. Trump drew the support of a huge number of states across the South and Midwest, while Clinton racked up massive majorities in the most populous states like New York and California.
Without an Electoral College, candidates would have little incentive to appeal to people outside the most urbanized, coastal states. Clinton was defeated because she couldn’t win over a majority of voters in the once Democrat-dominated Rust Belt that broke for Obama in the previous two elections.
The state results in the 2016 election also debunk the second major argument for abolishing the Electoral College: that candidates would only spend time campaigning in a few essential swing states.
Trump succeeded in defeating Clinton because he was able to pluck off a number of states—like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin—that had voted solidly Democrat for over a decade. This sudden shift is why Trump secured a surprise victory.
As author and Texas lawyer Tara Ross noted in a PragerU video, a state dominated by one party shifting to another is not a new phenomenon. California was a Republican stronghold until the late 1980s, and Texas used to be controlled entirely by Democrats.
Major electoral shifts have happened throughout American history, and will continue to do so as regions and political parties change. Demolishing the Electoral College should not be based on the outcome in a particular election.
Learn Why the Fence Was Built
The American system has had a remarkable success rate in transferring power from one presidential administration to the next.
This year, protestors unhappy with the election results have gathered in a few enclaves to denounce the president-elect. Some have even called for Democrat-dominated California to secede from the Union.
Yet, with the exception of 1860 (those secession threats were a little more serious than “#Calexit”), Americans have found a way to maintain an incredible record of political stability for over two centuries—in large part thanks to the Electoral College. It would be incredibly foolish to throw away that system for the sake of one side that didn’t get what it wanted this year.
The old adage that one should learn why a fence was built before tearing it down applies to our unique presidential election process. The rash call to dismantle the Electoral College that has been the model of stability over two centuries could do enormous damage to the United States.
Though the rules of the institution may seem strange, it is a carefully designed system conceived by the framers of the Constitution, and its opponents would do well to reflect on the reasons it was created before calling for its destruction.
God bless,
JohnnyD
Monday, November 14, 2016
Violent Anti-Trump Demonstrations by Young People a Cry for the Necessity of a MANDATORY Military Draft
From: Eagle Rising
Written by
The mass rioting and civil unrest that has broken out in protest of Donald J Trump’s winning the Presidential election is no different from the same violent mobs we’ve seen all during the Primaries at most Trump rallies. The fact is the same groups and organizations that promoted and carried out acts of violence against Trump supporters during his campaign, are the same radical organizations behind all post-election civil unrest now.
The same organizations such as Black Lives Matter (BLM) and their splinter groups like Take Em Down NOLA are again, inciting all anti Trump demonstrations we are witnessing now. These groups have proven themselves to be nothing more than domestic terrorist organizations since their formation.
Other organizations like MoveOn.org, National Organization for Women, and the ACLU are responsible for organizing and paying people to demonstrate via advertisements in local papers and CraigsList.org, wanting people to join public demonstrations at selected events. Of course, all the demonstrations share a nucleus of being supported and directed by the Obama Administration and the Clinton Crime Syndicate.
The young people who are influenced to riot are themselves afraid of a Trump Presidency and are so distraught at this stark reality of him being President that many are exhibiting a variety of emotions from sadness, disbelief, and anger.
Such emotions as we have seen since the Trump win are prime examples of a generation of young people who have been brainwashed by their established government since birth. Reactions to losing their mother government is shocking and terrifying as well as leaving most of them with disbelief that such a government change was even possible.
Some schools and universities are offering psychological counseling to students who are unable to cope with losing the government they have relied on to take care of them, the government that has told them what to do all their lives. This sort of weak mindset is the product of any Socialist or Nazi type of government that teaches everyone who will listen that they have no personal insight into any problems they face as a nation or world body and must rely entirely on the mother government to direct them in every aspect of their daily lives.
The demonstrations and riots we are seeing now, would not even be possible if not for them being orchestrated and carried out by domestic terrorist organizations directing the weak minded to fight for the survival of the mother government who takes care of them.
Today, we have a population of people below the age of 30 who rely on the government in all aspects of their daily life and do not know how to live life without being directed by a common parental figure like their government has been to them all their lives. Such people who have no personal direction, or individual ability to make decisions on their own, without the direction of their government and are so fragile in their personal mental constitution, are people who must be deprogrammed from an indoctrination of modern day Nazism and the fascist vision of a New World Order.
The riots and civil unrest we are experiencing recently, along with the growth of criminal street gangs, and an astounding population of people who have no personal ambition are examples of today’s youth not having any direction, or being taught morals and respect.
Unfortunately, we have the problems today as a result of our young people not being taught to stand on their own as adults and accept responsibility for their own actions. Today’s young people are mere zombies in every sense of the word who cannot think for themselves or make personal decisions that may sway away from the politically correct indoctrination they have been subjected to for all their lives.
The only real solution for these young people to be able to live a normal life in a constitutional United States is for them to be subjected to a mandatory military draft. If they had the guidance, respect, and acceptance of taking responsibility for their own actions as would be taught in the US military, they would become responsible citizens who respect and love their country, thus would become free thinking citizens on an individual level with a common goal of making their country great through making themselves as great as possible.
God bless,
JohnnyD
Written by
The mass rioting and civil unrest that has broken out in protest of Donald J Trump’s winning the Presidential election is no different from the same violent mobs we’ve seen all during the Primaries at most Trump rallies. The fact is the same groups and organizations that promoted and carried out acts of violence against Trump supporters during his campaign, are the same radical organizations behind all post-election civil unrest now.
The same organizations such as Black Lives Matter (BLM) and their splinter groups like Take Em Down NOLA are again, inciting all anti Trump demonstrations we are witnessing now. These groups have proven themselves to be nothing more than domestic terrorist organizations since their formation.
Other organizations like MoveOn.org, National Organization for Women, and the ACLU are responsible for organizing and paying people to demonstrate via advertisements in local papers and CraigsList.org, wanting people to join public demonstrations at selected events. Of course, all the demonstrations share a nucleus of being supported and directed by the Obama Administration and the Clinton Crime Syndicate.
The young people who are influenced to riot are themselves afraid of a Trump Presidency and are so distraught at this stark reality of him being President that many are exhibiting a variety of emotions from sadness, disbelief, and anger.
Such emotions as we have seen since the Trump win are prime examples of a generation of young people who have been brainwashed by their established government since birth. Reactions to losing their mother government is shocking and terrifying as well as leaving most of them with disbelief that such a government change was even possible.
Some schools and universities are offering psychological counseling to students who are unable to cope with losing the government they have relied on to take care of them, the government that has told them what to do all their lives. This sort of weak mindset is the product of any Socialist or Nazi type of government that teaches everyone who will listen that they have no personal insight into any problems they face as a nation or world body and must rely entirely on the mother government to direct them in every aspect of their daily lives.
The demonstrations and riots we are seeing now, would not even be possible if not for them being orchestrated and carried out by domestic terrorist organizations directing the weak minded to fight for the survival of the mother government who takes care of them.
Today, we have a population of people below the age of 30 who rely on the government in all aspects of their daily life and do not know how to live life without being directed by a common parental figure like their government has been to them all their lives. Such people who have no personal direction, or individual ability to make decisions on their own, without the direction of their government and are so fragile in their personal mental constitution, are people who must be deprogrammed from an indoctrination of modern day Nazism and the fascist vision of a New World Order.
The riots and civil unrest we are experiencing recently, along with the growth of criminal street gangs, and an astounding population of people who have no personal ambition are examples of today’s youth not having any direction, or being taught morals and respect.
Unfortunately, we have the problems today as a result of our young people not being taught to stand on their own as adults and accept responsibility for their own actions. Today’s young people are mere zombies in every sense of the word who cannot think for themselves or make personal decisions that may sway away from the politically correct indoctrination they have been subjected to for all their lives.
The only real solution for these young people to be able to live a normal life in a constitutional United States is for them to be subjected to a mandatory military draft. If they had the guidance, respect, and acceptance of taking responsibility for their own actions as would be taught in the US military, they would become responsible citizens who respect and love their country, thus would become free thinking citizens on an individual level with a common goal of making their country great through making themselves as great as possible.
God bless,
JohnnyD
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Anti-Trump protests: Left freaks out with hysterics, temper tantrums after a fair election
From: The Resurgent
For eight years the left has refused to hold itself accountable.
Having once declared dissent patriotic, dissent for the last eight years
has been homophobic, bigoted, and racist. Conservatives and people of
faith have been hounded from their jobs, silenced, and punished for
refusing to go along with the left’s agenda. The left demanded cultural
homogeneity and is outraged that Americans refuse to go along with
their anti-Christian secular agenda.
Yesterday, Americans had enough and decided to seek fundamental change.
Today, the left is protesting in the streets because of American democratic action. The left accuses Donald Trump of totalitarianism, but it is the left refusing to accept a democratic act. The left blasted Trump for suggesting the election was rigged. But they are okay with protesting a fair election and declaring it illegitimate because they hate the outcome.
For eight years I have watched parts of the right descend to madness as they presumed the worst about their opponents. Parts of the right had become convinced that the Clintons kill people and Barack Obama would refuse to vacate the White House. During all this, the left became convinced, by their own rhetorical overreach, that conservatives want to put black people back on plantations, castrate gays, and forcibly impregnate women.
Tonight, their chickens have come home to roost. Professional leftwing activists who have no skill other than agitation have trained a large group of people to do nothing but protest. Instead of trying to unite the country, they have flown into hysterics and temper tantrums.
A week ago the Democratic Party insisted that everyone accept the legitimacy of the election. What we are seeing today is that much of the left think that, like so many other things, it is a one way street.
This is what happens when you presume the worst about your neighbor. The left may love humanity as a concept, but they are prone to think the absolute worst of their neighbors and that contempt for those who see things differently is on full display in the streets of America.
Trump Derangement Syndrome has begun.
God bless,
JohnnyD
Yesterday, Americans had enough and decided to seek fundamental change.
Today, the left is protesting in the streets because of American democratic action. The left accuses Donald Trump of totalitarianism, but it is the left refusing to accept a democratic act. The left blasted Trump for suggesting the election was rigged. But they are okay with protesting a fair election and declaring it illegitimate because they hate the outcome.
For eight years I have watched parts of the right descend to madness as they presumed the worst about their opponents. Parts of the right had become convinced that the Clintons kill people and Barack Obama would refuse to vacate the White House. During all this, the left became convinced, by their own rhetorical overreach, that conservatives want to put black people back on plantations, castrate gays, and forcibly impregnate women.
Tonight, their chickens have come home to roost. Professional leftwing activists who have no skill other than agitation have trained a large group of people to do nothing but protest. Instead of trying to unite the country, they have flown into hysterics and temper tantrums.
A week ago the Democratic Party insisted that everyone accept the legitimacy of the election. What we are seeing today is that much of the left think that, like so many other things, it is a one way street.
This is what happens when you presume the worst about your neighbor. The left may love humanity as a concept, but they are prone to think the absolute worst of their neighbors and that contempt for those who see things differently is on full display in the streets of America.
Trump Derangement Syndrome has begun.
God bless,
JohnnyD
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)